2018
DOI: 10.3390/catal8120576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Accurate Spectrophotometric Evaluation of the Efficiencies of Photocatalysts in Processes Involving Their Separation Using Nylon Membranes

Abstract: Many works include the use of nylon membranes to separate the solid particles of photocatalysts from the photocatalytic reactors, before using spectrophotometers to evaluate the catalysts' performance in the photocatalytic degradation of many pollutants. This might lead to significant errors due to the adsorption of some pollutants within the structure of the membranes during the filtration process used to separate the solid particles of the photocatalysts to get a clear filtrate. This, consequently, leads to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were drawn from the reaction vessel every 5 min and filtered using a nylon filter paper of pore size 0.4 μm. It is good to note that no phenol elimination was observed using the mentioned nylon filter paper, as demonstrated earlier (Al-Kandari et al 2018 ). The progress of the photocatalytic reaction was monitored using a UV - Vis spectrophotometer in the range of 190–400 nm, with 279 nm corresponding to the highest absorption of phenol.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The samples were drawn from the reaction vessel every 5 min and filtered using a nylon filter paper of pore size 0.4 μm. It is good to note that no phenol elimination was observed using the mentioned nylon filter paper, as demonstrated earlier (Al-Kandari et al 2018 ). The progress of the photocatalytic reaction was monitored using a UV - Vis spectrophotometer in the range of 190–400 nm, with 279 nm corresponding to the highest absorption of phenol.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Conversely, as depicted in Figure 13b, incrementing the mass of nanospheres further (from 10 to 350 µg) inversely affects the % binding. This counterintuitive result is interpreted as the onset of nanoparticle aggregation when in high concentration within the 1.6 mL water sample [63]. Aggregation reduces the effective surface area available for R6G binding, since clusters of nanospheres offer fewer exposed binding sites compared to 0.0 0.5 the same mass of dispersed nanoparticles.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%