“…Based on the mass loading of the active material on both cathode and anode, the ASC exhibited a maximum energy density of 51 W h kg −1 at a power density of 800 W kg −1 (Figure f), which is comparable to, or even higher than, those of state‐of‐the‐art Co 3 O 4 ‐based ASCs . The specific energy and power densities of our ASC device are also comparable to other electrode materials reported in literatures, such as carbon tube/NiCo 2 S 4 nanotube//AC (27.7 W h kg −1 at 263.6 W kg −1 ), NiO/C‐HS//AC (30.5 W h kg −1 at 193 W kg −1 ), GQDs/MnO 2 ‐3//NG (118 W h kg −1 at 12 351 W kg −1 ), Co 3 O 4 /PANI//AC (41.5 W h kg −1 at 800 W kg −1 ), G@NiO‐1//NGH (52.6 W h kg −1 at 800 W kg −1 ), NiMoO 4 //carbon nanotube film (54.3 W h kg −1 at 4344 W kg −1 ), CuS–AC//AC (24.88 W h kg −1 at 800 W kg −1 ), NiCo 2 O 4 HNPs//AC (71 W h kg −1 at 1852 W kg −1 ), (Note: activated carbon (AC), carbon hollow spheres (C‐HS), graphene quantum dots (GQDs), nitrogen‐doped graphene (NG), polyaniline (PANI), nitrogen‐doped graphene hydrogel (NGH), HNPs) and some transition metal oxide‐ and nitride‐based supercapacitors . Because the ASC device possessed a maximum working voltage of 1.6 V with excellent energy density, both charged ASCs in series could effectively operate a red light‐emitting diode (LED) (inset of Figure f).…”