2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10672-009-9131-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Theory of Reinstatement: Seven Motivations for Reinstatement as Relationship Repair

Abstract: There is a long, interdisciplinary tradition of examining why organizations remove privileges from members as a part of disciplinary action. In contrast, little is known about why organizations return privileges after disciplinary action has occurred. Nonetheless, such reinstatement is ubiquitous in organizations. This paper provides a starting point for a theory of reinstatement by using the emerging theoretical domain of relationship repair. Treating reinstatement as relationship repair highlights the import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as a result, is "repaired" trust substantively different from "pristine" trust-that is, is trust which has been repaired in some way more substantively complex, durable, vigilant, "wise," and less susceptible to subsequent violation (by the same actor or other actors)? Relatedly, we would direct readers' attention to McCarter and Caza's (2010) arguments regarding the nature of reinstatement. A better and more precise metaphor for trust repair is required.…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as a result, is "repaired" trust substantively different from "pristine" trust-that is, is trust which has been repaired in some way more substantively complex, durable, vigilant, "wise," and less susceptible to subsequent violation (by the same actor or other actors)? Relatedly, we would direct readers' attention to McCarter and Caza's (2010) arguments regarding the nature of reinstatement. A better and more precise metaphor for trust repair is required.…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, in the case of involuntary exits, the process of actually severing the employment relationship, which is typically done by a managing supervisor, can be tremendously unpleasant, difficult, and depressing for supervisors (O'Reilly III & Weitz, 1980). Managers, in fact, may reinstate dismissed employees back for a last chance either because of a perceived normative obligation to all their employees or unionnegotiated reasons (Bamberger & Donahue, 1999;McCarter & Caza, 2010).…”
Section: Halted Exit Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These directions include explicating the antecedents and consequences of discretion in each domain, as there are likely to be important differences among the factors that influence the recognition and use of discretion in particular domains (e.g. Huang et al, 2010;McCarter and Caza, 2009;Pieterse et al, 2010), as well as how individuals respond to the exercise of discretion in each domain (e.g. Bryant et al, 2010;Haar and Spell, 2009;Yukl and Fu, 1999).…”
Section: Contributions Towards a Mature Theory Of Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%