Language and Materiality
DOI: 10.1017/9781316848418.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Theory of Language Materiality: An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…How can we conceptualize reading as an embodied and a textual practice? In answering this question, we have drawn inspiration from Shalini Shankar and Jillian Cavanaugh (2017), whose “language materiality” approach advocates paying attention to how each of the terms—language, materiality—helps us understand the other. In our cases, “putting language and materiality together at the center of analysis” (ibid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How can we conceptualize reading as an embodied and a textual practice? In answering this question, we have drawn inspiration from Shalini Shankar and Jillian Cavanaugh (2017), whose “language materiality” approach advocates paying attention to how each of the terms—language, materiality—helps us understand the other. In our cases, “putting language and materiality together at the center of analysis” (ibid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explorations of Christian textual ideologies or language ideologies, that is, cultural theories of how words operate in the world, tend to give less attention to the political-economic structures and embodied relations of textual practice (though for a critical reflection, see Bialecki and Hoenes del Pinal 2011). In order to widen the analytical frame, we combine work on “semiotic ideologies” (Keane 2007) and “language materiality” (Shankar and Cavanaugh 2017) to shed light on the important interweavings created across linguistic and material forms—including bodies—in Christian reading. Indeed, though not often analyzed alongside theories of Christian linguistic practice, scholarship on Christian women's organizations has often presumed inextricable connections between textual engagement and the cultural negotiation of tensions surrounding gender, religion, and race (see e.g., Griffith 2000; Casselberry 2017).…”
Section: Anthropological Perspectives On Reading In Christian Communimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Shankar and Cavanaugh, language should be considered a medium that travels through selected channels, such as the voice, the page, the screen, the MP3, and such forms "matter to what it is and does". 18 Speech, the voiced phonetic form, and text, the graphic form, are the most common modes of language used in everyday life. Both of these are products of physical activities that have a material presence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the recent interest in the materiality of language, culminating in an edited volume by Cavanaugh and Shankar (), led to many studies that employ the Peircean framework to focus on the materially conditioned mediality of linguistic practice—that is, “the quality, nature, and characteristics of the connections enabled by any particular medium” through which semiotic work takes place (Shankar and Cavanaugh , 4). Such extensions toward materiality, in turn, allow metasemiotic analysis to trace, with greater precision, the intermedial and interdiscursive movement of signs that produce specific ideological effects.…”
Section: Metasemiotic Chains Of Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%