1998
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1998.1255636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
445
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 718 publications
(465 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
14
445
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, since the four dimensions explicated in this section are common to the conceptualizations of workplace spirituality since 1994, they are best taken as multiple indicators of workplace spirituality as a multidimensional construct (Law et al, 1998). Whether its dimensions are effect indicators or causal indicators of workplace spirituality (i.e., whether the structural path arrows point toward or away from the Nurturing the Whole Person dimensions in relation to workplace spirituality, respectively) is a conclusion that can be reached and supported only through future empirical research (Edwards, 2001;Law and Wong, 1999).…”
Section: A Convergent Definition Of Workplace Spiritualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, since the four dimensions explicated in this section are common to the conceptualizations of workplace spirituality since 1994, they are best taken as multiple indicators of workplace spirituality as a multidimensional construct (Law et al, 1998). Whether its dimensions are effect indicators or causal indicators of workplace spirituality (i.e., whether the structural path arrows point toward or away from the Nurturing the Whole Person dimensions in relation to workplace spirituality, respectively) is a conclusion that can be reached and supported only through future empirical research (Edwards, 2001;Law and Wong, 1999).…”
Section: A Convergent Definition Of Workplace Spiritualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We select the love of money scale (LOM) for this study because LOM (a subset of the money ethic scale, MES) is considered one of the most welldeveloped and systematically used measures of money attitude in the literature (e.g., Lea and Webley, 2006;Mitchell and Mickel, 1999). The love of money (LOM) is defined as (1) one's attitudes toward money with affective, behavioral, and cognitive components; (2) the meaning one attributes to money, (3) one's desire for, value of, expectation about, or aspiration for money; (4) not one's need, greed, or materialism; (5) a multi-dimensional individual difference variable; and (6) a second-order latent construct with several first-order latent sub-constructs (Law et al, 1998). Researchers have investigated measurement invariance of the love of money scale across cultures (Luna-Arocas and Tang, 2004;Tang et al, 2005Tang et al, , 2006Tang et al, , 2007; college majors, and genders (Du and Tang, 2005).…”
Section: The Love Of Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this research shows that multi-dimensional constructs increases the overall construct understanding (Law et al 1998), and thereby provides details about its various facets (Petter et al 2007). Thus, tourism managers can use, with guarantee, the validated instrument to analyse the situation of each website quality dimension in order to identify those aspects that may need improvement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%