2015
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1064638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Taxonomy of Affective Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, willingness to engage in a transaction is potentially related to the breadth and depth of consumer search behaviours (Moe 2003) or the time spent at a particular address (Kim and Yum 2011;Kim et al 2005). Such developments increase the likelihood that a computer system will be able to understand a user's mental status (Picard 1995;Schwark 2015).…”
Section: Consumer Trackingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, willingness to engage in a transaction is potentially related to the breadth and depth of consumer search behaviours (Moe 2003) or the time spent at a particular address (Kim and Yum 2011;Kim et al 2005). Such developments increase the likelihood that a computer system will be able to understand a user's mental status (Picard 1995;Schwark 2015).…”
Section: Consumer Trackingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The capacity to understand user emotions will be an important starting point (Schwark 2015;Wu, Huang, and Hwang 2015), but there will be little point customising system response if it does not improve human-computer interaction. Hopefully, providing computers with a capacity to understand emotion (Picard 1995) might improve interfaces in the manner that better social skills improve interpersonal interaction (see Welford 1966Welford , 1987.…”
Section: Consumer Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four classes were identified in the previous section from a review of the literature: learning (White, 1973;Kazanas and Chawhan, 1975;Gatti-Petito et al, 2013), intelligence (Roberts, 1976;Schwark, 2015;Goksu and Gulcu, 2016;Nkhoma et al, 2017), autonomy (Dorais et al, 1999;Goodrich et al, 2001;Wiest, 2012), and communication (Bateman et al, 1990;Jäger and Rogers, 2012). We have chosen to base the learning subclasses on Gagne's Hierarchical Theory of Learning (Soulsby, 2006), a common hierarchy for learning.…”
Section: Classes and Subclassesmentioning
confidence: 99%