1997
DOI: 10.2307/259223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

72
2,521
6
165

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,183 publications
(2,764 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
72
2,521
6
165
Order By: Relevance
“…under the monitoring hypothesis it may erodes the independence and effectiveness of the board (Fama & Jensen, 1983) but the accumulation of powers of two figures in a single person (CEO duality) facilitates the transmission of information, reducing coordination costs and avoiding the emergence of potential conflict of interests between the two positions (Davis, Choorman, & Donaldson, 1997).The duality of CEO and BoD president in the same person is not considered a good mechanism for the independence of the latter over the executive power. In the same vein, Gul and Leung (2004) corroborate that such duality is associated with lower levels of voluntary disclosure.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…under the monitoring hypothesis it may erodes the independence and effectiveness of the board (Fama & Jensen, 1983) but the accumulation of powers of two figures in a single person (CEO duality) facilitates the transmission of information, reducing coordination costs and avoiding the emergence of potential conflict of interests between the two positions (Davis, Choorman, & Donaldson, 1997).The duality of CEO and BoD president in the same person is not considered a good mechanism for the independence of the latter over the executive power. In the same vein, Gul and Leung (2004) corroborate that such duality is associated with lower levels of voluntary disclosure.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideas embedded within this theory posit that the purpose of the governing board is to monitor and control the actions of the CEO (Davis & Schoorman, 1997). Agency theory assumes that the owners of an organisation will have divergent interests from those who manage it (Fama & Jensen, 1983).…”
Section: Locating the Study: Scholarly Conversations In Sport Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some alternative theories explain the board and its function, as well. Examples include the stewardship theory (Donaldson and Davis, 1991;Davis et al, 1997), resource dependence theory (Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978), and management entrenchment theory (Shleifer and Vishny, 1989). 5 Kind and Schläpfer (2011) show that stock markets react negatively to the dismissal of good CEOs.…”
Section: Internal Governance Mechanisms -Board Of Directorsmentioning
confidence: 99%