1997
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management

Abstract: Recent thinking about top management has been influenced by alternative models of man.* Economic approaches to governance such as agency theory tend to assume some form of homo-economicus, which depict subordinates as individualistic, opportunistic, and selfserving. Alternatively, sociological and psychological approaches to governance such as stewardship theory depict subordinates as collectivists, pro-organizational, and trustworthy. Through this research, .:^we attempt to reconcile the differences between t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

43
1,347
0
52

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,706 publications
(1,609 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
43
1,347
0
52
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we disagree with Anderson and Reeb (2003), Barontini and Caprio (2006), Kowalewski, Talavera and Stetsyuk (2010), Maury (2006), and Schulze, Lubatkin and Dino (2003), who claim that the objectives of the owner and the firm are aligned in family-owned firms. Based on our results , we assume that family-owned firms possess distinct resources such as the social capital and stewardship behavior stemming from common ancestry and shared family identity (Corbetta & Salvato, 2004), also supporting basic stewardship theory (Davis et al, 1997;Donaldson & Davis, 1991). In line with Carney (2005), we suppose that such resources influence family-owned firm performance and form the comparative advantage family-owned firms have over large public corporations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Thus, we disagree with Anderson and Reeb (2003), Barontini and Caprio (2006), Kowalewski, Talavera and Stetsyuk (2010), Maury (2006), and Schulze, Lubatkin and Dino (2003), who claim that the objectives of the owner and the firm are aligned in family-owned firms. Based on our results , we assume that family-owned firms possess distinct resources such as the social capital and stewardship behavior stemming from common ancestry and shared family identity (Corbetta & Salvato, 2004), also supporting basic stewardship theory (Davis et al, 1997;Donaldson & Davis, 1991). In line with Carney (2005), we suppose that such resources influence family-owned firm performance and form the comparative advantage family-owned firms have over large public corporations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Contrary to agency theory, the stewardship perspective uses a different model of man and assumes different situational and psychological antecedents to individual behaviors (Davis et al, 1997;Fox & Hamilton, 1994). Managers that act as stewards, rather than agents, gain higher utility from pro-organizational, collectivistic behavior than from individualistic, self-serving behavior presumed by agency theory.…”
Section: Family Ownership and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…This situation is particularly relevant to family businesses where kinship ties prevail between organizational members (Jaskiewicz & Klein, 2007;Lane, Astrachan, Keyt, & McMillan, 2006). Within family firms, the interests between owners and managers are well aligned, and governance mechanisms designed on agency-theoretic prescriptions may be redundant to and inefficient in family firms, because the stewards automatically tend to pursue the advantages of the firms (Davis et al, 1997;Pieper et al, 2008).…”
Section: Family Ownership and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Executives of firms operating in a particular country are subject to the pressure imposed by that country's national culture. Because, countries differ in their culture, the degree of constraints of those societal norms varies from one country to another (Davis et al, 1997). In this vein, the degree of respect, status, privilege and influence accorded to leaders will correspondingly fluctuate across cultures (House el al., 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%