Toward a reliable assessment of potential ecological impacts of deep‐sea polymetallic nodule mining on abyssal infauna

Abstract

The increasing demand for metals is pushing forward the progress of deep-sea mining industry. The abyss between the Clarion and Clipperton Fracture Zones (CCFZ), a region holding a higher concentration of minerals than land deposits, is the most targeted area for the exploration of polymetallic nodules worldwide, which may likely disturb the seafloor across large areas and over many years. Effects from nodule extraction cause acute biodiversity loss of organisms inhabiting sediments and polymetallic nodules. Attention to deep-sea ecosystems and their services has to be considered before mining starts but the lack of basic scientific knowledge on the methodologies for the ecological surveys of fauna in the context of deep-sea mining impacts is still scarce. We review the methodology to sample, process and investigate metazoan infauna both inhabiting sediments and nodules dwelling on these polymetallic-nodule areas. We suggest effective procedures for sampling designs, devices and methods involving gear types, sediment processing, morphological and genetic identification including metabarcoding and proteomic fingerprinting, the assessment of biomass, functional traits, fatty acids, and stable isotope studies within the CCFZ based on both first-hand experiences and literature. We recommend multi-and boxcorers for the quantitative assessments of meio-and macrofauna, respectively. The assessment of biodiversity at species level should be focused and/or the combination of morphological with metabarcoding or proteomic fingerprinting techniques. We highlight that biomass, functional traits, and trophic markers may provide critical insights for biodiversity assessments and how statistical modeling facilitates predicting patterns spatially across point-source data and is essential for conservation management.

Correct Species Identification and Its Implications for Conservation Using Haploniscidae (Crustacea, Isopoda) in Icelandic Waters as a Proxy

“…Through this type of webbased taxonomic projects, a variety of other meta information could be added to complement species identification, including biogeographical, ecological, and collection data, as well as images and sketches (Farr, 2006). The latter would facilitate the exchange of data between researchers on undescribed species, as this is the case in many deep-sea regions, and Lins et al, 2021). In practice, one could imagine integrating undescribed species based on preliminary identifications into interactive keys (cf.…”

Evaluating species richness using proteomic fingerprinting and DNA barcoding—a case study on meiobenthic copepods from the Clarion Clipperton Fracture Zone

“…Currently (2022), the International Seabed Authority has already issued 17 licenses for the exploration of polymetallic nodules in the CCZ. In this context, it is especially important to develop effective, fast and low-cost methods to initially investigate the baseline and potentially later to monitor the benthic fauna exposed to mining activities (Lins et al 2021). MALDI-TOF MS could be especially attractive for quantitative assessments (specimen-by-specimen) of benthic communities as it does not require an extensive taxonomic knowledge and is considerably cheaper than DNA barcoding .…”

Insights from the management of offshore energy resources: Toward an ecosystem-services based management approach for deep-ocean industries

“…Protecting the value of biodiversity, ecosystems, and ecosystem services in the open ocean and deep sea requires a holistic approach that enables environmental management planning (Tunnicliffe et al, 2020). For example, Sala et al (2021) proposed preserving biodiversity, food, and climate security as strategic goals for protecting the global ocean. They estimated that the most effective way to achieve these goals would be to combine the three objectives into a coordinated cross-sectoral global effort.…”