2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-907-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Refined Paradigm for Architecting Usable Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indicators of e‐learning tool usability are known as usability attributes, and include effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction (see Table for definitions; Folmer and Bosch, ; Koohang and du Plessis, ). Design properties that can impact usability attributes are known as usability properties and include, but are not limited to, presentation design and interactive feature choice (Koohang and du Plessis, ; Rafla et al, ). Koohang and du Plessis () summarized the value of usability in the e‐learning tool design process using two broad questions, “does it work well?” and “does it look great?”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators of e‐learning tool usability are known as usability attributes, and include effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction (see Table for definitions; Folmer and Bosch, ; Koohang and du Plessis, ). Design properties that can impact usability attributes are known as usability properties and include, but are not limited to, presentation design and interactive feature choice (Koohang and du Plessis, ; Rafla et al, ). Koohang and du Plessis () summarized the value of usability in the e‐learning tool design process using two broad questions, “does it work well?” and “does it look great?”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%