2000
DOI: 10.1163/156916400746623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Minimalist Phenomenology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marion's philosophy has at times been criticized for veering into theology (Smith (1999); Janicaud (2000); Gschwandtner (2019)). Yet, Marion will insist that in articulating the characteristics of saturated phenomena he is not making a metaphysical claim about transcendent reality but simply outlining a possible phenomenon.…”
Section: Constructing the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marion's philosophy has at times been criticized for veering into theology (Smith (1999); Janicaud (2000); Gschwandtner (2019)). Yet, Marion will insist that in articulating the characteristics of saturated phenomena he is not making a metaphysical claim about transcendent reality but simply outlining a possible phenomenon.…”
Section: Constructing the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pero, al mismo tiempo, y como contra-crítica, ¿no habrá ocurrido que la fenomenología se ha ido ocupando cada vez más de los objetos físicos, olvidando otras modalidades de donación, derivando así en una doctrina capax entis, pero imposibilitada para tratar con otras realidades del mundo humano (capax passionis)? Janicaud parece estar convencido de algo: que el método fenomenológico no es lo que debería ser en los escritos de Levinas, Marion, Chrétien y Henry, y ello en virtud de que esta segunda generación de fenomenólogos franceses desea implicarse, aunque Janicaud (2000) formula esta afirmación bajo una forma inquisitiva, en la apertura a lo invisible, al Otro, a la donación, a la Archirrevelación: "The opening [ouverture] to the invisible, to the Other [Autre], to a pure givenness [donation], or to an archi-revelation"? (p. 17).…”
Section: ¿Destrucción Del Sujeto?unclassified
“…As László Tengelyi (2010) argues, phenomenology applied from its naissance what several authors termed ‘methodological atheism’. To support this claim, Tengelyi uses Dominique Janicaud’s text (1991), which suggests that phenomenology departed its original framework of the dedicated analysis of the apparent and changed to the analysis of the inapparent, the subject matter of theology. For Janicaud, this change was in some sense inappropriate or at least non-phenomenological.…”
Section: The Problem Of Revelation In Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%