2013
DOI: 10.1080/02500167.2013.864448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a measurement tool for the monitoring of media diversity and pluralism in South Africa: A public-centred approach

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They can already been criticized on a more theoretical, normative basis. Duncan & Reid (2013) warn that they 'emphasize diversity for diversity's sake, leading to a postmodern, relativistic "anything goes" approach to public discourse, where society's most pressing concerns are drowned in a cacophony of different voices' (p. 486). More practically, most of the existing approaches look at media markets in their entirety (external diversity) (Karppinen, 2015), and less at the diversity within a particular outlet (internal diversity).…”
Section: Diversity In the Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can already been criticized on a more theoretical, normative basis. Duncan & Reid (2013) warn that they 'emphasize diversity for diversity's sake, leading to a postmodern, relativistic "anything goes" approach to public discourse, where society's most pressing concerns are drowned in a cacophony of different voices' (p. 486). More practically, most of the existing approaches look at media markets in their entirety (external diversity) (Karppinen, 2015), and less at the diversity within a particular outlet (internal diversity).…”
Section: Diversity In the Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such visibility in the news affords these groups a measure of power, and thus improved social status (Avraham and First, 2010). Expressing one’s views in the media is a minimum requirement to exert influence which can lead to reshaping public opinion or actuating policy (Duncan and Reid, 2013). But the systematic underrepresentation of specific demographic groups fosters the notion that such groups have a lower social status in society – that is, a feeling that they do not really matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This steered past attempts to distinguish between freedom of the press as a universal liberty and as a subject-dependent capability. Such an attitude is comparable to tensions visible in our times, wherein the rationale of public intervention is contested by a neoliberalism that stands for individualist relativism (Duncan and Reid, 2013: 486). The notion of freedom in the judgement was also an unqualified one, since it disregarded the implications of market power leveraged by the ‘big press’.…”
Section: Diversity Unpacked: the First Press Commissionmentioning
confidence: 88%