2006
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: Geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types.

Abstract: Three experiments tested whether geometric biases-biases away from perceived reference axesreported in spatial recall tasks with pointing responses generalized to a recognition task that required a verbal response. Seven-year-olds and adults remembered the location of a dot within a rectangle and then either reproduced its location or verbally selected a matching choice dot from a set of colored options. Results demonstrated that geometric biases generalized to verbal responses; however, the spatial span of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A shift in encoding strategy to incorporate cues is consistent with the idea of flexibility in spatial cognition (Simmering, Spencer, & Sch枚ner, 2006;Spencer, Simmering, & Schutte, 2006). Hund and Plumert (2005) demonstrated how stability and flexibility in forming category structures varies developmentally.…”
Section: University Of South Carolina Columbia South Carolinamentioning
confidence: 50%
“…A shift in encoding strategy to incorporate cues is consistent with the idea of flexibility in spatial cognition (Simmering, Spencer, & Sch枚ner, 2006;Spencer, Simmering, & Schutte, 2006). Hund and Plumert (2005) demonstrated how stability and flexibility in forming category structures varies developmentally.…”
Section: University Of South Carolina Columbia South Carolinamentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The existence of vertical and horizontal categories is well supported in the literature on orientation discrimination (e.g., Quinn & Bomba, 1986) and in good agreement with the widely-shared idea that these orientations correspond to the norm (e.g. Luyat & Gentaz, 2002;McIntyre, Stratta, & Lacquaniti, 1998;Spencer, Simmering, & Schutte, 2006). Admittedly, this model does not explain all features of the complex pattern of systematic errors observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 39%
“…Although the CA model can capture the qualitative pattern of results observed in recall studies with children and adults, this model has several limitations relative to the DFT (see also Spencer, Simmering & Schutte, 2006). First, the CA model is not a process model: it does not specify the process that gives rise to spatial memories (e.g., perceptual processes involved in the formation of activation peaks in the DFT), how memories for location evolve in real time (e.g., peak drift in the DFT), the process that gives rise to the formation of spatial categories (e.g., the emergence of spatial categories in LTM SWM and the use of perceived reference frames in the DFT), and the process that gives rise to developmental changes in spatial recall abilities (e.g., the spatial precision hypothesis).…”
Section: Comparing the Dft To Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%