2016
DOI: 10.14195/2182-8830_4-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Formal Ontology for Narrative

Abstract: A navegação consulta e descarregamento dos títulos inseridos nas Bibliotecas Digitais UC Digitalis, UC Pombalina e UC Impactum, pressupõem a aceitação plena e sem reservas dos Termos e Condições de Uso destas Bibliotecas Digitais, disponíveis em https://digitalis.uc.pt/pt-pt/termos.Conforme exposto nos referidos Termos e Condições de Uso, o descarregamento de títulos de acesso restrito requer uma licença válida de autorização devendo o utilizador aceder ao(s) documento(s) a partir de um endereço de IP da insti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the suggestion expressed by Elam, our goal, here, is to formalize a theory of dramatic action (Elam, 1980), which may subsequently accommodate in its framework an actantial structure drawn from semiotic studies. A relevant contribution in this sense is provided by the narrative ontology proposed by Ciotti (2016): mainly based on the tradition of semiotic and structuralist narratology, it contains key notions such as Actant, Action, and Actor. The use of the computational ontology format not only allows the encoding of the conceptual model of drama in a formal, unambiguous way, as called for by Varela (2016), but also makes the knowledge about drama both available as a vocabulary for the interchange of annotations across different projects and readily usable as a representational tool for applications that process and manipulate these annotations in automatic ways.…”
Section: Background and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the suggestion expressed by Elam, our goal, here, is to formalize a theory of dramatic action (Elam, 1980), which may subsequently accommodate in its framework an actantial structure drawn from semiotic studies. A relevant contribution in this sense is provided by the narrative ontology proposed by Ciotti (2016): mainly based on the tradition of semiotic and structuralist narratology, it contains key notions such as Actant, Action, and Actor. The use of the computational ontology format not only allows the encoding of the conceptual model of drama in a formal, unambiguous way, as called for by Varela (2016), but also makes the knowledge about drama both available as a vocabulary for the interchange of annotations across different projects and readily usable as a representational tool for applications that process and manipulate these annotations in automatic ways.…”
Section: Background and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…literary themes) in each domain and their heights from the root LTO class. LTO is engineered to fit within the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) top level ontology class hierarchy [48] in order to facilitate interoperability with other emerging fiction studies ontologies [49][50][51][52][53]. LTO is meant to cover important, operationally verifiable literary themes that can be expected reoccur in multiple works of fiction [7].…”
Section: The Star Trek Television Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%