The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dty054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a dynamic capabilities scale: measuring organizational sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the key critiques on the DC literature is that it only addresses the empirical world at a quite abstract level. Therefore, there is a substantial challenge to translate it into practice [117]. This problem is even more relevant since much advancement and recent literature point towards DC as the primary BMI antecedent [3].…”
Section: A Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key critiques on the DC literature is that it only addresses the empirical world at a quite abstract level. Therefore, there is a substantial challenge to translate it into practice [117]. This problem is even more relevant since much advancement and recent literature point towards DC as the primary BMI antecedent [3].…”
Section: A Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCs As reflective constructs in explorative models are allowed redundancy, 14 indicators were adapted from Wilden et al (2013) and Kump et al (2018) borrowing concepts from two qualitative study on HEIs' DCs (Leih and Teece 2016;Teece 2018). During the calculation of the measurement model, we excluded five indicators due to redundancy, below-threshold reliability and/or discriminant validity (Hair et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O detalhamento operacional permite esclarecer a natureza das capacidades dinâmicas. A capacidade dinâmica pode ser melhor compreendida pela operacionalização de Kump et al, (2018). Sentir o contexto do ambiente pode ser traduzido nas ações da empresa em conhecer as melhores práticas do mercado, buscar informações sobre o mercado e monitorar competidores.…”
Section: Referencial Teóricounclassified
“…Para a avaliação do grau de capacidades dinâmicas de uma organização, o presente trabalho utilizou como constructos as próprias capacidades sentir, aproveitar e transformar propostas por Teece (2007), conforme descritos no capítulo anterior, sendo as DCs entendidas como um constructo de segunda ordem. Tais constructos foram operacionalizados adotando-se a proposta de questionário de Kump et al (2018), para avaliar a capacidade de sentir, aproveitar e transformar por meio de uma escala de "discordo fortemente" a "concordo fortemente, com o objetivo de capturar a percepção do respondente quanto à organização onde atua. O constructo de capacidade dinâmicas é um constructo de segunda ordem reflexivo de sentir, aproveitar e transformar.…”
Section: Constructosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation