Toward a Dialogic Theory of Fundraising

McAllister, Sheila M.

doi:10.1080/10668920903527043

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We classified the perceived positive and negative effects associated with CWAs into a taxonomy, covering eight categories (Table 2; [2,27,32,53,72,76,94,100,102,103, 105,107-110,122,130,138-178,265,266]).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the frameworks, the concept of communities of practice [266] was used to classify 3 studies reporting that CWAs improved the communication of tacit knowledge. The Dialogic Theory of Public Relations [265] was used to describe 5 positive effects wikis could have on public relations between health care organizations and consumers.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… a The Donabedian framework [93] for quality improvement was used to describe processes and outcomes. b These items are processes that were taken from other psychological and organizational frameworks for change and used to describe and classify the effects of CWAs found in this review [2,94,265,266]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… b These items are processes that were taken from other psychological and organizational frameworks for change and used to describe and classify the effects of CWAs found in this review [2,94,265,266]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCollaborative writing applications (eg, wikis and Google Documents) hold the potential to improve the use of evidence in both public health and health care. The rapid rise in their use has created the need for a systematic synthesis of the evidence of their impact as knowledge translation (KT) tools in the health care sector and for an inventory of the factors that affect their use.ObjectiveThrough the Levac six-stage methodology, a scoping review was undertaken to explore the depth and breadth of evidence about the effective, safe, and ethical use of wikis and collaborative writing applications (CWAs) in health care.MethodsMultiple strategies were used to locate studies. Seven scientific databases and 6 grey literature sources were queried for articles on wikis and CWAs published between 2001 and September 16, 2011. In total, 4436 citations and 1921 grey literature items were screened. Two reviewers independently reviewed citations, selected eligible studies, and extracted data using a standardized form. We included any paper presenting qualitative or quantitative empirical evidence concerning health care and CWAs. We defined a CWA as any technology that enables the joint and simultaneous editing of a webpage or an online document by many end users. We performed qualitative content analysis to identify the factors that affect the use of CWAs using the Gagnon framework and their effects on health care using the Donabedian framework.ResultsOf the 111 studies included, 4 were experimental, 5 quasi-experimental, 5 observational, 52 case studies, 23 surveys about wiki use, and 22 descriptive studies about the quality of information in wikis. We classified them by theme: patterns of use of CWAs (n=26), quality of information in existing CWAs (n=25), and CWAs as KT tools (n=73). A high prevalence of CWA use (ie, more than 50%) is reported in 58% (7/12) of surveys conducted with health care professionals and students. However, we found only one longitudinal study showing that CWA use is increasing in health care. Moreover, contribution rates remain low and the quality of information contained in different CWAs needs improvement. We identified 48 barriers and 91 facilitators in 4 major themes (factors related to the CWA, users’ knowledge and attitude towards CWAs, human environment, and organizational environment). We also found 57 positive and 23 negative effects that we classified into processes and outcomes.ConclusionsAlthough we found some experimental and quasi-experimental studies of the effectiveness and safety of CWAs as educational and KT interventions, the vast majority of included studies were observational case studies about CWAs being used by health professionals and patients. More primary research is needed to find ways to address the different barriers to their use and to make these applications more useful for different stakeholders.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bu bilgiler ışığında çevreci STK'ların diyalogsal iletişim açısından Instagram'ı verimli bir şekilde kullandığı söylenebilir. Kuruluşların sosyal medyada diyalogsal iletişim ilkelerini yeterince etkin kullanmadığını belirten çalışmalardan (Taylor et al, 2001;Bortree & Seltzer, 2009;McAllister, 2013;Köseoğlu & Köker, 2014;Kim et al, 2014); Türkal & Güllüpunar, 2017) farklı olarak Instagram platformuna yönelik olan bu çalışmada diyalogsal iletişim açısından etkin bir kullanım tespit edilmiştir.…”

Section: Etkileşime Yönelik Bulgularunclassified

Reading Instagram Posts of Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the Context of Dialogic Principles and Public Relations Models

Alemdar¹,

Kocaömer²

2021

CONNECTIST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Web 2.0 teknolojisinin kullanıcıları aktifleştiren yapısı halkla ilişkiler alan yazınında "iletişimin yönü, etkileşim, diyalog" tartışmalarına zemin hazırlamıştır. Diyalog kavramının STK'lar özelinde incelenmesi ise sosyal medya kullanımlarını geliştirme noktasında önemlidir. Sosyal medya platformu Instagram, alan yazında diyalogsal ilkeler özelinde yeterince ele alınmamaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışma, çevreci STK'ların Instagram içeriklerindeki diyalogsal iletişim ilkelerini, halkla ilişkiler modellerini ve etkileşimi anlama çabasındadır. Instagram üzerinde en fazla takipçiye sahip üç çevreci STK olan; TEMA, Greenpeace ve WWF'nin paylaşımları; içerik analizi tekniği ile değerlendirilmektedir. Bu süreçte paylaşımlar; Kent ve Taylor tarafından belirlenen diyologsal ilkeler ışığında irdelenmekte, Grunig ve Hunt tarafından sunulan halkla ilişkilerin 4 modeline göre kategorileştirilmekte ve Avidar'ın yanıt piramidine göre etkileşim oranları hesaplanmaktadır. Bulgular, çevreci STK'ların Instagramı diyalogsal iletişim ilkelerini yansıtacak şekilde kullandığı yönündedir. Halkla ilişkiler modelleri açısından değerlendirildiğinde ise en çok kamuoyu bilgilendirme modeli kullanılmştır. Halkla ilişkiler modelleri arasından asimetrik bir modelin en yüksek frekansa sahip olması, ayrıca etkileşim oranlarının zayıflığı, bilgi akışının yönüne (STK'lardan kullanıcılara yönelik) ilişkin "tek yönlü bilgi akışı ve zayıf etkileşim ile diyalogsal ilkeler yerine getirilebilir mi?" sorusunun düşünülmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

show abstract

Reasons and Representations

Mayfield

Walker

2020

New Perspectives in Organizational Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Toward a Dialogic Theory of Fundraising

Cited by 9 publications

References 35 publications

Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review

Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review

Reading Instagram Posts of Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the Context of Dialogic Principles and Public Relations Models

Reasons and Representations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About