Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992

Abstract

Coherent democracies and harshly authoritarian states have few civil wars, and intermediate regimes are the most conflict-prone. Domestic violence also seems to be associated with political change, whether toward greater democracy or greater autocracy. Is the greater violence of intermediate regimes equivalent to the finding that states in political transition experience more violence? If both level of democracy and political change are relevant, to what extent is civil violence related to each? Based on an analysis of the period 1816–1992, we conclude that intermediate regimes are most prone to civil war, even when they have had time to stabilize from a regime change. In the long run, since intermediate regimes are less stable than autocracies, which in turn are less stable than democracies, durable democracy is the most probable end-point of the democratization process. The democratic civil peace is not only more just than the autocratic peace but also more stable.

Recruitment and Allegiance

“…3 So rather than focusing on the factors that trigger or inhibit rebellion, this study examines the sustenance of such groups, more specifically the critical factors that affect recruitment and compliance in an armed rebel group. In this manner, the model developed below explores the theoretical foundations underlying the duration of civil war (Collier, Hoeffler, and Soderbom 1999;Fearon 2001) rather than the factors affecting the onset of civil war (Collier and Hoeffler 2001;Hegre et al 2001).…”

Promoting Healthy Growth: What Are the Priorities for Research and Action?

“…We nevertheless argue for such a relationship and test for it using slightly better data, alternative model specifications, and different estimation methods. We look for a parabolic association between democracy and civil war (Hegre et al 2001), because we expect anocracies (at the midrange of the democracy-autocracy spectrum) are most significantly associated with civil war. We also use a twice-lagged measure of democracy (poll2), because the impact of level of democracy on civil violence may be more significant in the medium term if democracy is seen as a permissive rather than a proximate factor in civil violence.…”

“…Polity ranges from -10 (high autocracy) to 10 (high democracy). We test the well-known hypothesis that the relationship between civil violence and democracy is not linear (Hegre et al 2001). We test for this by adding poll12-the square of poll1-to the model specification.…”

Scarcity and Cooperation Along International Rivers

“…12. One study unrelated to international freshwater that describes an inverted U-shaped curve is Hegre et al 2001. Giordano, Giordano, and Wolf 2005 consider the relationship between natural resources in general, scarcity and conºict.…”