Toward a Conceptual Framework for Blending Social and Biophysical Attributes in Conservation Planning: A Case-Study of Privately-Conserved Lands

Abstract

There has been increasing recognition within systematic conservation planning of the need to include social data alongside biophysical assessments. However, in the approaches to identify potential conservation sites, there remains much room for improvement in the treatment of social data. In particular, few rigorous methods to account for the diversity of less-easily quantifiable social attributes that influence the implementation success of conservation sites (such as willingness to conserve) have been developed. We use a case-study analysis of private conservation areas within the Little Karoo, South Africa, as a practical example of the importance of incorporating social data into the process of selecting potential conservation sites to improve their implementation likelihood. We draw on extensive data on the social attributes of our case study obtained from a combination of survey questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. We discuss the need to determine the social attributes that are important for achieving the chosen implementation strategy by offering four tested examples of important social attributes in the Little Karoo: the willingness of landowners to take part in a stewardship arrangement, their willingness to conserve, their capacity to conserve, and the social capital among private conservation area owners. We then discuss the process of using an implementation likelihood ratio (derived from a combined measure of the social attributes) to assist the choice of potential conservation sites. We conclude by summarizing our discussion into a simple conceptual framework for identifying biophysically-valuable sites which possess a high likelihood that the desired implementation strategy will be realized on them.

Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia

“…Our results can not only assist conservation organizations with identifying and understanding the factors that influence landholders' willingness to engage in riverine restoration on their land, but the information we collected can also be used to inform spatially explicit decision making for restoration (e.g., Knight et al, 2010;Pasquini et al, 2010). Data on socio-economic factors that influence landholders' willingness and engagement of actions can be used to identify areas of conservation opportunity where both public and private benefits can be achieved (Raymond and Brown, 2011).…”

“…We conducted a total of 21 interviews, accounting for 23 (92%) of the 25 properties. Our sample size, which represents almost the entire population, is consistent with social research that involves landholder interviews (e.g., Pasquini et al, 2010;Moon and Cocklin, 2011), which tend to be fewer than studies that use surveys to elicit data. Fourteen interviews (67%) were conducted face-toface, and the remaining seven (33%) by telephone.…”

Using social data in strategic environmental assessment to conserve biodiversity

“…Similarly, certain land use preferences, recreational activities, employment types and resource uses may conflict with conservation outcomes. Data can be collected via maps of aboriginal cultural landscapes (Ridges, 2006), visitor perceptions of park experiences, environmental impacts, and facilities (Brown and Weber, 2011), social values for natural capital and perceived threats (Bryan et al, 2011), and willingness of landholders to steward natural resources (Pasquini et al, 2010).…”

A practical approach for putting people in ecosystem‐based ocean planning

“…To understand the complexity of human–environmental interactions in a planning region, practitioners must ultimately bring all available social and ecological information together into integrated assessments (Pasquini et al . 2010; Ban et al .…”