Toward a Better Understanding of Self-Construal Theory: An Agency View of the Processes of Self-Construal

Abstract

LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author's final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.Running head: SELF-CONSTRUAL THEORY: AN AGENCY VIEW This article offers a novel perspective on self-construal theory. Self-construal concerns how individuals understand who they are in relation to the broad set of cultural influences in which they live. We look at the nature and antecedents of self-construal, and characterize it as a self-process, rather than self-knowledge. Integrating work from the literature on social and evolutionary psychology, and philosophy, we suggest that the differences between independent and interdependent self-construal are best understood from a self-agency perspective. This concerns how people assess whether they are the causes of an action and, if so, whether their causal role depends on other people. We introduce and discuss the roles of three different modalities of agency involved in agency assessment: implicit (sensorimotor), intermediate (self-related affordances), and explicit (reflective) self-agency. We offer a conceptual model on how self-agency relates to power, evolutionary motivations and to social and cultural affordances, in the formation of, and interaction with, different types of dominant independent and interdependent self-construals.Keywords: self-construal, self-agency, power, social and cultural affordances, social environment, evolutionary psychologyIn 1991, Markus and Kitayama published an article that focused on a fundamental question of psychology-namely, the relationship between the individual self and the social and cultural setting. This became one of the most influential articles of the decade, referred to by Devine and Brodish (2003, p. 200) as a 'modern classic in social psychology'; it is the fourth (see Footnote 1) most cited Psychological Review paper in the web of science (Anderson, 2011). Self-construal theory's original framing-the first systematic social psychological attempt to map the relationship between culture and the self-remains powerfully insightful today.Self-construal theory introduced a new way to understand the individual consequences of cross-cultural differences, in terms of their implications for the construal of the self. Relating the debates on Eastern versus Western values to the individual level, Markus and Kitayama (...

Economic and social distance: Perceived income inequality negatively predicts an interdependent self‐construal

“…In the present research, we tried to respond, at least partly, to the recent question asked by Voyer and Franks () about which are the bases of self‐construal. Some researchers have shown that social class (Markus & Conner, ) and social power (Voyer & Franks, ) are important bases.…”

“…In the present research, we tried to respond, at least partly, to the recent question asked by Voyer and Franks () about which are the bases of self‐construal. Some researchers have shown that social class (Markus & Conner, ) and social power (Voyer & Franks, ) are important bases. This suggests that individuals who are powerful or from a high social class tend to be more independent, whereas those who are powerless or from a low social class tend to be more interdependent.…”

Cooperation and Trust in Japanese and British Samples: Evidence From Incomplete Information Games

“…Finally, the proposed differentiation in trust shows interesting parallels with selfconstrual theory (Markus & Kitayama, 1991;Voyer & Franks, 2014). This theory proposes different types of self-concepts: People with more independent self-concepts place a stronger emphasis on their personal characteristics, while people with more interdependent self-concepts define themselves more frequently in terms of successful relationships.…”

The Nietzschean precedent for anti-reflective, dialogical agency

“…Doris offers a thought-provoking and persuasive account of the interrelations of self, agency, and moral action. We especially welcome its emphasis on social, dialogical, and evolved origins of agency, which echo to important developments in the field (Voyer & Franks 2014), suggesting that the sense of self, in arising from agency, is an evolved and cultural construction (Franks 2014). Its broadly pluralistic approach to determining which aspects of context have a role in this process, and how, is congenial to an empirically grounded approach to agency and the self.…”