2013
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2013.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tourism Ecological Security in Wuhan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the identified obstacle factors vary across different regions. For instance, the analysis of obstacle factors affecting tourism ecological security in Wuhan revealed that the main obstacles include the proportion of environmental protection investment to GDP, tourism building density, and the rate of increase in tourism land demand [9]. In contrast, the results of the obstacle diagnosis in this study indicate that factors such as forest coverage are the primary obstacles.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the identified obstacle factors vary across different regions. For instance, the analysis of obstacle factors affecting tourism ecological security in Wuhan revealed that the main obstacles include the proportion of environmental protection investment to GDP, tourism building density, and the rate of increase in tourism land demand [9]. In contrast, the results of the obstacle diagnosis in this study indicate that factors such as forest coverage are the primary obstacles.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…It serves as a significant topic in ecological security assessment and represents a novel management objective for sustainable tourism destinations. Additionally, it holds a prominent position in ecological security research [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no unified standard in the academic community for evaluating tourism ecological security. This study proposes a grading standard based on existing research results (Yajuan et al, 2013;, and the actual situation in Huangshan City (Peng et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2019;. The proposed standard divides tourism ecological security into seven categories: deterioration, risk, sensitivity, critical security, general security, relative security, and extreme security.…”
Section: Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no unified standard in the academic community for evaluating tourism ecological security. This study proposes a grading standard based on existing research results (Yajuan et al, 2013;Tang et al, 2018), and the actual situation in Huangshan City (Peng et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2020). The proposed standard divides tourism ecological security into seven categories: deterioration, risk, sensitivity, critical security, general security, relative security, and extreme security.…”
Section: Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%