Abstract:Highlights
Feature Binding/integration in the motor domain in Tourette Syndrome (TS) is examined.
Motor binding processes and interleaved action are intact in TS.
Binding processes are differentially modulated in the motor domain and sensori-motor processes.
“…Thus, in contrast to healthy controls, in whom stimulus–response translation processes reflected by C‐cluster modulations mediate binding on a behavioral level, 38,56 the motor component of perception–action integration processing is accentuated in FMD. The latter finding does not contradict the conceptualization of altered perception–action integration in FMD because both sensory and motor processes (R‐cluster) 57,58 constitute processes occurring in an event file 23 . R‐cluster effects were associated with activation differences in the inferior frontal gyrus, that is, BA44, a hub region of inhibitory control processes to implement executive control, 59,60 which have been shown to be altered in FMD 61 …”
“…Thus, in contrast to healthy controls, in whom stimulus–response translation processes reflected by C‐cluster modulations mediate binding on a behavioral level, 38,56 the motor component of perception–action integration processing is accentuated in FMD. The latter finding does not contradict the conceptualization of altered perception–action integration in FMD because both sensory and motor processes (R‐cluster) 57,58 constitute processes occurring in an event file 23 . R‐cluster effects were associated with activation differences in the inferior frontal gyrus, that is, BA44, a hub region of inhibitory control processes to implement executive control, 59,60 which have been shown to be altered in FMD 61 …”
“…An EEG study of lateral readiness potentials, a measure of activation and preparation of responses occurring in motor cortical areas, showed that action integration per se was normal in patients with TS, suggesting that TS is not only a movement disorder. 53 EEG studies characterizing oscillatory activity and functional connectivity revealed that children with tics exhibited abnormal activation and communication patterns within the frontal-parietal lobe network during cognitive inhibition 54 and that children with TS suppressed tics through a distributed brain circuit of cortical regions. 29 In an EEG study of TS patients and controls, movement-related EEG (i.e., mu- and beta-band oscillations) was examined just before voluntary movements and tics were performed.…”
We summarize selected research reports from 2021 relevant to Tourette syndrome that the authors consider most important or interesting. The authors welcome article suggestions and thoughtful feedback from readers.
“…Due to its particularly notable motor symptoms, GTS has long been viewed and classified as a movement disorder, and treatment efficacy is indeed usually evaluated in terms of scores focusing on motor output [ 23 ]. However, several lines of research reviewed elsewhere [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] have reported numerous non-motoric peculiarities of GTS patients, such as hypersensitivity to external stimuli [ 27 ] and general perceptual processing [ 28 ], abnormal sensorimotor interaction [ 29 , 30 ], and a dependence of symptoms on attention [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Moreover, the degree to which motor symptoms can be controlled [ 34 ] has been reported to form the basis of cognitive–behavioral interventions, and an increased tendency to create habits has been observed [ 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Efficient transfer of concepts and mechanistic insights from the cognitive to the health sciences and back requires a clear, objective description of the problem that this transfer ought to solve. Unfortunately, however, the actual descriptions are commonly penetrated with, and sometimes even motivated by, cultural norms and preferences, a problem that has colored scientific theorizing about behavioral control—the key concept for many psychological health interventions. We argue that ideologies have clouded our scientific thinking about mental health in two ways: by considering the societal utility of individuals and their behavior a key criterion for distinguishing between healthy and unhealthy people, and by dividing what actually seem to be continuous functions relating psychological and neurocognitive underpinnings to human behavior into binary, discrete categories that are then taken to define clinical phenomena. We suggest letting both traditions go and establish a health psychology that restrains from imposing societal values onto individuals, and then taking the fit between behavior and values to conceptualize unhealthiness. Instead, we promote a health psychology that reconstructs behavior that is considered to be problematic from well-understood mechanistic underpinnings of human behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.