2022
DOI: 10.1002/app.52522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toughness enhancement of polyamide 6,12 with intermolecular hydrogen bonding with 3‐pentadecylphenol

Abstract: Due to the brittle performance of polyamide 6,12 (PA6,12) in high impact environment, we report a facile, efficient, and scalable method to toughen PA6,12 by establishing intermolecular hydrogen bonding (H‐bonding) interaction with 3‐pentadecylphenol (PDP). Interestingly, the intermolecular H‐bonding interaction obviously hindered PA crystallization, which was evidenced by decrease of crystalline temperature from 186.8 to 175.8°C and prolong of crystallization half‐time from 0.27 to 0.37 min, when the amount o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…74,75 Finally, it is important to note that, in this study, a significant amount of energy dissipation can be attributed to the decohesion of the matrix from highspecific-surface-area rubber nanofibrils at the interface when strong adhesion in the presence of the compatibilizer exists between the two components. 76,77 Notably, while the enhancement in elongation at break for compatibilized nanofibrillar composites is considerably more pronounced compared to noncompatibilized nanofibrillar and compatibilized spherical samples, it is noteworthy that the results for the latter two exhibit a close resemblance, albeit with a slightly greater improvement observed in the noncompatibilized samples. While neat HDPE exhibited a high elongation at break at room temperature, the in situ nanofibrillation process, coupled with the enhancement of the interface between the two components, resulted in a notable improvement in elongation at break under these conditions.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…74,75 Finally, it is important to note that, in this study, a significant amount of energy dissipation can be attributed to the decohesion of the matrix from highspecific-surface-area rubber nanofibrils at the interface when strong adhesion in the presence of the compatibilizer exists between the two components. 76,77 Notably, while the enhancement in elongation at break for compatibilized nanofibrillar composites is considerably more pronounced compared to noncompatibilized nanofibrillar and compatibilized spherical samples, it is noteworthy that the results for the latter two exhibit a close resemblance, albeit with a slightly greater improvement observed in the noncompatibilized samples. While neat HDPE exhibited a high elongation at break at room temperature, the in situ nanofibrillation process, coupled with the enhancement of the interface between the two components, resulted in a notable improvement in elongation at break under these conditions.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The PDP ratio was optimized since a higher impact strength for composites was achieved in our previous work. 17 Next, the ternary PA10,12/PDP/MWCNTs composites were prepared with various amounts of MWCNTs containing 0.8, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 wt%, respectively. Based on the MWCNT loading, all the ternary composites are denoted as PA/PDP/CNT+ X , in which X refers to the amount of CNT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al 16 exploited H-bonds between nano-calcium whiskers and PA10,12 to effectively improve B30% the composite's tensile strength due to stress transfer enhancement. In our previous work, 17 we incorporated 30 wt% 3-pentadecylphenol (PDP) to tailor intermolecular H-bonds between PA6,12 and PDP, and the impact strength of the PA composite significantly enhanced to 17.5 kJ m À2 , whereas its tensile strength was dramatically decreased to 32 MPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%