2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toughening strategies in adhesive joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curves fluctuate with polylines because during the peeling test, the cohesion force among the fibers fails to be bonded jointly by thermal bonding and then becomes the stress concentration point [42]. Subsequently, the tensile force propagates to the thermal bonding points or interlocking interface, and the composites exhibit higher peeling strength [27,43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curves fluctuate with polylines because during the peeling test, the cohesion force among the fibers fails to be bonded jointly by thermal bonding and then becomes the stress concentration point [42]. Subsequently, the tensile force propagates to the thermal bonding points or interlocking interface, and the composites exhibit higher peeling strength [27,43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions must be found to assess the influence of different geometric parameters and technological aspects [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In general, it is necessary to develop damage tolerant designs of (1) simple joints (SLJs) or (2) more complex structural joints that will have a higher toughness against crack propagation and will be less prone to scatter in strength [37]. Other vital issues include optimization, fracture characterization, and comparisons of FEM models with laboratory results [38,39,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental challenge for industrial applications is to ensure high reliability and durability of adhesive or hybrid joints over the entire service lifetime of the connected structural elements. The satisfaction of these requirements will lead to optimization and further improvement regarding the following: Enhanced strength and toughness of adhesive joints by the addition of nanoparticles, fibers, or woven mats, e.g., [42,43], or the introduction of a “stop hole” to blunt the tip of a crack [37]; the application of more effective mechanical fastening, e.g., “z-pins” [37]; the modification of the lap joint area geometry; the use of modern joining techniques, such as friction stir welding, e.g., [44], laser beam welding, or electron beam welding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one involves a modification of the interface itself, for instance through the generation of microstructural gradients within the layers surrounding the interface under concern (e.g. entanglement of polymer networks (Brown, 1991)), mechanical interlocking (Kim et al, 2010;Larsson et al, 2005), crack arrest patterns (Maloney and Fleck, 2019) or complex interface morphology (Cordisco et al, 2016). While efficient, these techniques are restrictive as they imply a complex deformation and fracture process or can be used only for specific materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%