2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-020-09516-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Touch vs. click: how computer interfaces polarize consumers’ evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, this research identifies an interesting dimension of food shopping behavior that largely differs when purchases are made in mobile and PC shopping environments. A stream of research on online shopping has compared PC and mobile shopping behaviors such as impulse purchasing (Seeger et al, 2019) and search behavior (Ghose et al, 2013; Naegelein, Spann, and Molitor 2019; Wang et al, 2020). However, no research has compared the effect of food expiration dates between mobile and PC shopping environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, this research identifies an interesting dimension of food shopping behavior that largely differs when purchases are made in mobile and PC shopping environments. A stream of research on online shopping has compared PC and mobile shopping behaviors such as impulse purchasing (Seeger et al, 2019) and search behavior (Ghose et al, 2013; Naegelein, Spann, and Molitor 2019; Wang et al, 2020). However, no research has compared the effect of food expiration dates between mobile and PC shopping environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it enriches the understanding about how expiration date affects the sales of non-perishable food products. Second, this study contributes to a stream of research that compares shopping behaviors under PC and mobile environments (Luceri, Bijmolt and Bellini 2022; Naegelein, Spann, and Molitor 2019; Seeger et al, 2019; Wan et al, 2022; Wang et al, 2020). To our knowledge, this research is the first to contrast the effect of impending expiration date between PC and mobile shopping environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we did not measure whether or not the respondents used a mobile device and thus interacted with touch screens during their shopping task. Touch screens are sensory interfaces that facilitate haptic interactions and influence search behavior and product choice ( Brasel and Gips, 2015 ; Shen et al, 2016 ; Chung et al, 2018 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Future research might reveal additional results by considering mobile device use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies support this proposition and demonstrate that consumers with high instrumental NFT are more confident in their choices, less likely to see risks associated with their choices, and they are more likely to make (vs. defer) purchase decisions when using touch screens. Wang et al (2020)'s studies indicate that a direct-touch (vs. indirect-touch) interface has a polarizing effect on consumer evaluations. For an object that consumers have a prior positive attitude toward, a direct-touch interface enhances consumer evaluations; for an object that consumers have a prior negative attitude toward, a direct-touch interface lowers consumer evaluations.…”
Section: Touch Through Touch Screensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al. (2020)'s studies indicate that a direct‐touch (vs. indirect‐touch) interface has a polarizing effect on consumer evaluations. For an object that consumers have a prior positive attitude toward, a direct‐touch interface enhances consumer evaluations; for an object that consumers have a prior negative attitude toward, a direct‐touch interface lowers consumer evaluations.…”
Section: Device‐mediated Touchmentioning
confidence: 99%