2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w2-33-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Touch Interaction With 3d Geographical Visualization on Web: Selected Technological and User Issues

Abstract: Commission VI, WG VI/4 KEY WORDS: 3D visualization, interaction, human computer interaction, user issues, touch screen. ABSTRACT:The use of both 3D visualization and devices with touch displays is increasing. In this paper, we focused on the Web technologies for 3D visualization of spatial data and its interaction via touch screen gestures. At the first stage, we compared the support of touch interaction in selected JavaScript libraries on different hardware (desktop PCs with touch screens, tablets, and smartp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggested classification can be used to compare the virtual movement parameters and visualizations mentioned in Section 1.2. Other methods that can be used according to the proposed scheme are described by, for example, Chittaro and Ieronutti [33], Zanbaka et al [34], Cirio et al [35], Treves et al [36], Herman and Stachoň [20], and Herman et al [16,59].…”
Section: Methods For Analyzing and Visualizing User Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggested classification can be used to compare the virtual movement parameters and visualizations mentioned in Section 1.2. Other methods that can be used according to the proposed scheme are described by, for example, Chittaro and Ieronutti [33], Zanbaka et al [34], Cirio et al [35], Treves et al [36], Herman and Stachoň [20], and Herman et al [16,59].…”
Section: Methods For Analyzing and Visualizing User Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All user interaction data and user responses were recorded and stored on the server for later analysis. The 3DmoveR and two derived variants, 3DtouchR (3D Touch Interaction Recorder) and 3DgazeR (3D Gaze Recorder), have been used in several user studies [31,38,[42][43][44]55,60].…”
Section: Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a technological point of view, it is now possible to perform user testing directly with interactive 3D maps, which may be more appropriate regarding the transferability of results into practice in the design and implementation of 3D geovisualizations (see Juřík et al [60]). Technologies that permit testing in controlled [38] and non-controlled conditions [56] can be connected to eye-tracking devices [33] and various interfaces, such as a touch screens [43,44] or the Wii Remote Controller [30], and other technologies for stereoscopic (real-3D) visualization with different immersion levels [34,37,57].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the software is still being developed and new functionality is constantly incorporated in order to react to the development in the area of cognitive cartography. Current developmental efforts focus on 3D technology implementation (pilot experimental testing of 3D visualization using web technologies has already been made [85,86]), optimization for tablets or other devices with touch screens [87], interconnection with an eye-tracking system, and further development of a Firefox-based browser. The new application using Firefox was able to replace the original SWT-browser based solution in controlled data collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%