1996
DOI: 10.1080/0300443961260107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Touch Among Children at Nursery School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculations of the frequency of adult-child touch suggest that the younger children were more often involved in haptic contact with educators than were the older children (see also Cigales et al 1996;Fleck and Chavajay 2009). These findings lend support to prior research showing that young children (toddlers) need bodily attention and support in many areas of their daily life in preschool, and that such support is given/provided not only when dressing, eating, but also during educational activities.…”
Section: Touch and Agesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our calculations of the frequency of adult-child touch suggest that the younger children were more often involved in haptic contact with educators than were the older children (see also Cigales et al 1996;Fleck and Chavajay 2009). These findings lend support to prior research showing that young children (toddlers) need bodily attention and support in many areas of their daily life in preschool, and that such support is given/provided not only when dressing, eating, but also during educational activities.…”
Section: Touch and Agesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Other studies have also provided support for the finding that younger children (e.g. infants and toddlers) require and are involved in more haptic contact with adults than are older preschool children (Cigales et al 1996).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Several interview studies with preschool personnel in nursery contexts in the U.K. (examining the notion of 'professional love') suggest that caring emotional responsiveness and intimacy are common characteristics of the adult-child interaction in nurseries, and that child-minders respond to children's solicitations of closeness and physical contact (Page and Elfer 2013;Quan-McGimpsey, Kuczynski, and Brophy 2011), although they can simultaneously experience professional and emotional dilemmas. Children themselves can seek intimacy and touch from caregivers, as shown in observational studies of childinitiated touch in ECEC in the U.S. (Cigales et al 1996;Fleck and Chavajay 2009). Age was a significant factor in the distribution of touches, with younger children more frequently seeking bodily contact with other children and with teachers.…”
Section: Research On Interpersonal Touchmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Children' peer touch in early childhood settings Young children's use and experiences of touch have been explored only in a handful of observational quantitative studies in early childhood educational settings in the USA (Field et al 1994;Cigales et al 1996;Fleck and Chavajay 2009). They suggest that children's touch conduct differs from that of adults, and that it changes over time.…”
Section: Research On Intergenerational Touch In Educational Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Touch is prevalent in young children's lives in the socio-material space of early childhood institutions, where children spend time with educators and a large number of peers (e.g. Bergnehr and Cekaite 2018;Cigales et al 1996;Ben-Ari 2013). However, research on touch in institutional settings has so far mainly focused on intergenerational adult-child touch and is largely conducted through interviews with educators concerning their notions of appropriate educatorchild touch, and there is an on-going discussion about children's bodily integrity, with the appropriateness of educator touch being called into question (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%