2003
DOI: 10.2996/kmj/1050496648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Totally umbilical lightlike submanifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then from (14), we obtain (42)ḡ(R(X,JX)Z,JZ) = − c 2 g(X, X)g(Z, Z) + 1 2 (∇ XJ )(Z) 2 for any X ∈ Γ(D 0 ) and Z ∈ Γ(JL 2 ). On the other hand, from (12) and (38) we have…”
Section: Lemma 56 ([21]) Ifm Is a Nearly Kaehler Manifold Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then from (14), we obtain (42)ḡ(R(X,JX)Z,JZ) = − c 2 g(X, X)g(Z, Z) + 1 2 (∇ XJ )(Z) 2 for any X ∈ Γ(D 0 ) and Z ∈ Γ(JL 2 ). On the other hand, from (12) and (38) we have…”
Section: Lemma 56 ([21]) Ifm Is a Nearly Kaehler Manifold Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…h * and A * are Γ(RadT M )-valued and Γ(S(T M ))-valued bilinear forms and are called as second fundamental forms of distributions S(T M ) and RadT M , respectively. Using (6) and (10), we obtain…”
Section: Lightlike Submanifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow Duggal-Jin [3] for notations and results used in this paper. Throughout this paper we denote by F (M ) the algebra of smooth functions on M and by Γ(E) the F (M ) module of smooth sections of any vector bundle E over…”
Section: Lightlike Submanifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%