The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010185.pub4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported a mean intervention time of 108.5 min, which is in line with our mean intervention time of 107.8 min [18]. For elective standard percutaneous EVAR, a large meta-analysis reported mean intervention times to be approximately 108 min [19]. This underscores the notion that, though technically demanding, add-on sac and targeted rupture site embolization can be performed without significantly prolonging the intervention time, given the required level of expertise of the interventional radiologist.…”
Section: Periprocedural Findings and General Considerationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…They reported a mean intervention time of 108.5 min, which is in line with our mean intervention time of 107.8 min [18]. For elective standard percutaneous EVAR, a large meta-analysis reported mean intervention times to be approximately 108 min [19]. This underscores the notion that, though technically demanding, add-on sac and targeted rupture site embolization can be performed without significantly prolonging the intervention time, given the required level of expertise of the interventional radiologist.…”
Section: Periprocedural Findings and General Considerationssupporting
confidence: 83%