2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12593-009-0019-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total wrist arthroplasty: A review

Abstract: Total wrist arthroplasty was first performed over a hundred years ago. However, it did not prove a viable option until the late 1960s with the advent of the Swanson implant. Since then there have been many advances. The changes in design, and their rationale, are discussed in this article. The latest implants, the advances made and the indications for surgery are addressed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second implant generation, introduced in the 1970s, was hard-bearing multicomponent prostheses. There is no consensus about the definition of second-generation implants [ 3 , 5 , 13 ]. Generally, these implants consist of a radial component and a carpal component that is fixed into one or more metacarpal bones after bone resection [ 3 , 5 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second implant generation, introduced in the 1970s, was hard-bearing multicomponent prostheses. There is no consensus about the definition of second-generation implants [ 3 , 5 , 13 ]. Generally, these implants consist of a radial component and a carpal component that is fixed into one or more metacarpal bones after bone resection [ 3 , 5 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the popularity of TWA, the mid-term to long-term implant durability remains unclear [ 7 ]. A recent meta-analysis of 500 wrist replacements (18 studies) compared with 800 wrist fusions (20 studies) of Cavaliere and Chung [ 2 ] suggested that fusion provided equally good results and was, therefore, more cost-effective [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The complexity of wrist joint anatomy, biomechanics and complications after surgery, which all dampening the initial enthusiasm on searching a perfect design of the prosthesis, made surgeons cave to the reigning of the fusion, after all the wrist arthrodesis has proven to be the most successful. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The instability of the wrist after the total wrist replacement is the No. 1 killer of every prosthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the top one on the list which severely damage the wrist joint, and today also is the primary indication for the TWR. 1 , 10 , 12 But for the radiocarpal arthritis, the fusion remains the first choice of the majority of hand surgeons. 2 While considering the RA patients usually with multiple joints involved, fusion may lead to a greater impairment and disability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 As a result, wrist arthroplasty was reserved for older, low demand patients. 3,4 More recent generations of implants have concentrated on uncemented designs with minimal constraint, with provision of alternate articulating surfaces aimed at diminishing wear and allowing greater motion. [5][6][7] This philosophy (and options to facilitate conversion to arthrodesis as a salvage procedure in certain designs) has resulted in an expansion of patient eligibility criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%