Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0790-8_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Variation in Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we follow the dual approach to the minimization of the variational energies proposed by Chambolle in [18] for the 2D case. This approach has been adopted in general segmentation and denoising applications [18][19][20]. However, it has not been applied previously to liver segmentation in MRI.…”
Section: System and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we follow the dual approach to the minimization of the variational energies proposed by Chambolle in [18] for the 2D case. This approach has been adopted in general segmentation and denoising applications [18][19][20]. However, it has not been applied previously to liver segmentation in MRI.…”
Section: System and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regularizer is not so widely used nowadays as its performances are below many state-of-the art reconstruction methods (in particular, based on deep learning or other non-local techniques), yet, being convex and relatively simple, it is still useful and popular for large scale inverse problems (typically, medical imaging applications) or in low noise regimes. We refer to [25,23] for a quick introduction to total variation for imaging and to [32] for more numerical details and algorithms. In fact, these notes are not only focused on imaging applications, as one might need to minimize the total variation for other goals, such as computing minimal surfaces, equilibrium configurations of mixtures with surface tension, etc.…”
Section: The Total Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that there is no unique ground-truth classification of an image with respect to which the output an algorithm can be compared. In the literature many models for restoration and/or segmentation of image have been developed, such as the Mumford-Shah [9,42] and the TV-L 2 and TV-L 1 functionals [22,48].…”
Section: Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%