2013
DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2012.680498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total utility demand prediction for multi-dwelling sites by a bottom-up approach considering variations of inhabitants’ behaviour schedules

Abstract: This article reports systematic case studies based on a Total Utility Demand Prediction System presented in the authors' previous works, in which one can follow a bottom-up approach to accurately calculate the time series utility loads (energy, power, city water, hot water, etc.) for multi-dwelling systems, including residential buildings, residential block areas and even an entire city. This calculation considers the behavioural variations of the inhabitants of the dwellings. In the case studies, we assumed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ToU data sets focused on one-day diaries documenting the everyday activities of households of 5,000-10,000 households are common data sets used to build device use models (Wilke, 2013;Tanimoto et al, 2013;Richardson et al, 2010;Widén et al, 2012). Also, IJESM 16,4 there are long-term testing trials in which appliances have been monitored using electrical power measurements for extended periods (Page, 2007;Tabak and de Vries, 2010).…”
Section: Electricity Demand Models and Household Appliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ToU data sets focused on one-day diaries documenting the everyday activities of households of 5,000-10,000 households are common data sets used to build device use models (Wilke, 2013;Tanimoto et al, 2013;Richardson et al, 2010;Widén et al, 2012). Also, IJESM 16,4 there are long-term testing trials in which appliances have been monitored using electrical power measurements for extended periods (Page, 2007;Tabak and de Vries, 2010).…”
Section: Electricity Demand Models and Household Appliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to these concerns, researchers have been developing a growing number of increasingly complex models (for example, stochastic, agent-based models), mostly derived by actual data (e.g. Haldi and Robinson 2010;Tanimoto et al 2013;Yun and Steemers 2008;Page et al 2008;Tanimoto and Hagishima 2005). Due to their conceptual differences, a distinction is made between the modelling formalisms used for presence, adaptive actions (actions performed as a reaction to indoor/outdoor variables, such as opening a window) and nonadaptive actions (such as the use of equipment).…”
Section: Occupant Behaviour and Modelling Complexitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Calculation Methodology (NCM) used in the UK for calculations of compliance to Building Regulations (Building Research Establishment 2015) is one class of bottom-up model based on space-use type. Other bottom-up models focus on individual device types (Menezes 2013;Rysanek and Choudhary 2015) or individual occupant behaviours (Tanimoto et al 2013). For nondomestic buildings as considered here, evidence suggests that the action of an individual occupant or individual device has less impact on the energy demand than the nature of the space use and hence a bottom-up model akin to the NCM approach would be the most suitable approach (Gilani, O'Brien, and Gunay 2018;Ward et al 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%