“…17a: 1H NMR (250MHz, (d,J6.7Hz, 3H), 1.06 (d, J6.8Hz, 3H), 1.18-1.39 (m, 3H), 1.34(s, 9H), 2.04-2.13 (m, lH), 2.43 (s, br, lH), 2,98 (d, J 14.1 Hz, lH), 3.90 (dd,JS.O, 6.3 Hz, 1H),3.98(d7J8.8Hz, 1H),4.18(dd,J14.174.1 Hz, lH), 4.60 (dd, J 8.7, 1.2 Hz, lH), 5.07 (d, J 3.4 Hz, lH), 6.75 (dd, J 8.4,2.4Hz,lH),6.84(dd,J7.6,2.4Hz,lH),6.93(dd,J8.4,2.1Hz, lH), 7.34 (dd, J 7.6, 2.1Hz7 1H); 17b: lH NMR (250MHz, (d,J6.7Hz,3H),1.07(d,J6.3Hz73H),1.14-1.37(m,3H),1.34(s, 9H), 1.95-2.11 (m, lH), 3.14 (dd, J 13.3, 6.4Hz, lH), 3.81 (d, J2.5 Hz, lH), 3.82 (d, J 13.3 Hz, lH), 3.95 (d, J8. 8 Support of this research work by BASF AG, the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr W. Rozdzinski for mass spectra and Prof. E. Haslinger for a sample of natural frangulanine to compare with the synthetic product.…”