2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.64.044611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total reaction and neutron-removal cross sections of(3060)AMeVBe isotopes on Si and Pb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of R m = 2.42(4) fm for 7 Be derived in this work coincides within the errors with the result of Warner et al [34], but exceeds essentially the value of R m = 2.31(2) fm obtained by Tanihata et al [17]. A comparison of the rms radii R m and R p calculated using different theoretical models together with the experimental values is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The value of R m = 2.42(4) fm for 7 Be derived in this work coincides within the errors with the result of Warner et al [34], but exceeds essentially the value of R m = 2.31(2) fm obtained by Tanihata et al [17]. A comparison of the rms radii R m and R p calculated using different theoretical models together with the experimental values is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For both investigated nuclei, a good description of the cross sections was obtained with all the used density parameterizations. The value of R m = 2.42(4) fm deduced for 7 Be is larger than the matter radii obtained in previous experiments based on measurements of the total interaction [17] and reaction [34] cross sections. On the other hand, the present R m value is in perfect agreement with most of the theoretical predictions (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculations are in agreement with the data. Moreover, there is some experimental data [17] above 100 MeV, and a good agreement is likewise obtained in this region. For , some experimental data [18,19] originate from the natural silicon target, and the theoretical results are in reasonable agreement.…”
Section: LIsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…To improve the results, the coupled-channel calculations will be considered in the future work. For the total reaction cross-sections of on light targets, only the experimental data [17] for at incident energies of 224.0 and 350.7 MeV is available. The data at 18.8 MeV is obtained by analyzing the experimental data of elastic angular distributions [25,26] using the coupled-channel method.…”
Section: Bementioning
confidence: 99%