2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total phallic reconstruction using radial forearm free flap after iatrogenic penile amputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] Phalloplasty using different flaps is also another option when none of the above solutions could be performed. [8,9] Because of the testosterone impact on the fetus brain and the variety of procedures, sex reassignment seems not to be a good option. The penile strangulation causes gradual swelling, ischemia and skin ulceration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] Phalloplasty using different flaps is also another option when none of the above solutions could be performed. [8,9] Because of the testosterone impact on the fetus brain and the variety of procedures, sex reassignment seems not to be a good option. The penile strangulation causes gradual swelling, ischemia and skin ulceration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scrotal flap technique is simple with fewer complications, but it is difficult to obtain appropriate bulkiness, and has cosmetic disadvantages after surgery arising from ectopic hair growth [6,7]. The radial forearm free flap provides an adequately thin flap and yields good results in terms of appearance and function, but requires a microscopic procedure and has relatively high complication and donor morbidity rates [8]. On the other hand, the groin flap, while often requiring two-stage surgeries, yields better erectile function and penile bulkiness to fill the contour defect than the skin graft technique and also requires a shorter operation Original Article and results in fewer complications than other flap methods [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%