2019
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2018.2882203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Optimization of Energy Networks in a Smart City by Multi-Swarm Differential Evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural gas and electric power utilities, and drinking water and wastewater treatment plant sectors are categorized into the energy supply-side group. The other sectors are categorized into the demand-side group [8,27].…”
Section: A Summary Of the Whole Smart City Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Natural gas and electric power utilities, and drinking water and wastewater treatment plant sectors are categorized into the energy supply-side group. The other sectors are categorized into the demand-side group [8,27].…”
Section: A Summary Of the Whole Smart City Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, supplied energies by supply-side sectors and energy loads of demand-side sectors should be the same. The details are shown in [9,27].…”
Section: Sector Models In the Supply-side Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the optimization model constructed in this paper, the IMOPSO algorithm was used to solve the calculation example. The population size of the IMOPSO algorithm was 80, and µ min = 0.5, µ max = 0.8, σ = 0.2 [30,31]. The installation position and capacity of the electric regenerative heating equipment are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Results Analysis (1) Optimal Scheduling Results Of Etshe Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution network contained 19 distributed photovoltaics with a capacity of 0.5 MW, which were connected to nodes 7, 9, 14, 31, 35, 36, 52, 54, 59, 60, 63, 78, 85, 87, 95, 96, 113, 114, and 117. The distribution network also contained 10 distributed wind power generation with a capacity of 0.5 MW, which were connected to nodes 4,18,25,26,28,30,32,40,41, and 42. The rest of the data is consistent with the IEEE-33 system, which is not repeated here.…”
Section: Basic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%