1999
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/11/47/307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total neutron diffraction: the correct way to determine the true structure of crystalline materials?

Abstract: Crystallography, using conventional Bragg diffraction, and the study of atomic correlation functions, using total diffraction, have historically been carried out separately. There exist two different scientific communities, which in the case of neutron diffraction normally use different instruments. However, modern time-of-flight neutron diffractometers allow data to be collected to high maximum momentum transfer, Qmax, and with good reciprocal-space resolution, d/d. The high Qmax yields correlation functions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation function approach to the analysis of total diffraction data was originally developed mostly for structural studies of non-crystalline materials [5,6]. However, recently correlation function methods are increasingly being applied to the study of the structure of disordered crystalline materials [7][8][9]. The correlation function provides a measurement of the instantaneous interatomic distances which occur in a sample, and the advantage of using the correlation function method is that it provides a direct measurement of these distances which is model-independent and does not depend on assumptions about the LRO or crystallographic symmetry.…”
Section: Theoretical Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation function approach to the analysis of total diffraction data was originally developed mostly for structural studies of non-crystalline materials [5,6]. However, recently correlation function methods are increasingly being applied to the study of the structure of disordered crystalline materials [7][8][9]. The correlation function provides a measurement of the instantaneous interatomic distances which occur in a sample, and the advantage of using the correlation function method is that it provides a direct measurement of these distances which is model-independent and does not depend on assumptions about the LRO or crystallographic symmetry.…”
Section: Theoretical Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the lone-pair Pb 2+ ion, a low coordination number (in the range 2-5) involves a highly asymmetric coordination shell in which the bonds to its neighbours are directed throughout only part of the encompassing globe, with an identifiable void in the distribution of bonds [44]. For high coordination numbers (9,10) the coordination shell of Pb 2+ is symmetric in nature, with the bonds distributed much more evenly in direction, whilst for intermediate coordination numbers (6)(7)(8) either type of bond distribution may be found. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional powder diffraction experiments typically focus on the observed Bragg peaks (in Q-space), and the analogous studies of amorphous materials focus on the diffuse pair correlation function (in real-, r-, space). Here, a total diffraction strategy is adopted 26 in which Bragg analysis in Q-space and Fourier analysis of the r-space pair distribution, to provide both crystallographic and local order information, are combined. The experimentally determined interference functions, i(Q), for the unreacted and reacted samples are shown in Fig.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1͑a͔͒. Neutron total-scattering methods have enabled realspace modeling of the local structure via the experimental pair distribution function, 7,17,18 and very good agreement in real space was obtained for a model in which the square-grid layers are stacked in a perpendicular direction at intervals of 3.20 Å. 7 The same model also accounted for the sharp diffraction features in reciprocal space but was unable to reproduce the diffuse scattering or to predict the correct reflection conditions ͓Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%