2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2013000100016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total lesion of the radial nerve in the arm with preservation of the superficial radial nerve sensory action potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pattern C may be due to anatomical variation of the paths of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves. This possibility was investigated in 3 arms showing pattern C. Absence of the superficial branch of the radial nerve and total replacement of the innervation to the dorsum of the thumb and index finger by the LAC nerve has been reported . One of the 3 pattern C arms in this series was found to have this variation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Pattern C may be due to anatomical variation of the paths of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves. This possibility was investigated in 3 arms showing pattern C. Absence of the superficial branch of the radial nerve and total replacement of the innervation to the dorsum of the thumb and index finger by the LAC nerve has been reported . One of the 3 pattern C arms in this series was found to have this variation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The idea for this study came from the observation of a patient with a complete lesion of the radial nerve (RN), in the arm segment and preservation of the superficial radial nerve (RSN) sensory nerve action potential (SNAP). This case could be explained by an anatomic variation (Davidovich et al 2013). As anatomic variation may complicate the interpretation of nerve conduction data, we searched for a nerve conduction technique for evaluating this particular problem, but were unable to find any in the literature at that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This case could be explained by an anatomic variation (Davidovich et al. 2013). As anatomic variation may complicate the interpretation of nerve conduction data, we searched for a nerve conduction technique for evaluating this particular problem, but were unable to find any in the literature at that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%