2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3571-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: TLH had a longer operation time, yet, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain and fewer complications, compared to TAH and VH using EBVS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
17
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the effect, the TLH group tends to have both lower rate of major surgical complications and lower rate of postoperative discomfort symptoms, and shorter LOS and shorter time back to normal actives compared to TAH. These findings are consistent with the empirical studies conducted elsewhere in the world [ 13 , 22 , 25 , 26 , 59 , 60 ]. Empirical studies from the US [ 26 , 61 ], the Netherlands [ 52 , 53 , 60 , 62 ], the UK [ 25 ] and China [ 63 ] all report that TLH had lower but insignificant complications rates compared to TAH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With respect to the effect, the TLH group tends to have both lower rate of major surgical complications and lower rate of postoperative discomfort symptoms, and shorter LOS and shorter time back to normal actives compared to TAH. These findings are consistent with the empirical studies conducted elsewhere in the world [ 13 , 22 , 25 , 26 , 59 , 60 ]. Empirical studies from the US [ 26 , 61 ], the Netherlands [ 52 , 53 , 60 , 62 ], the UK [ 25 ] and China [ 63 ] all report that TLH had lower but insignificant complications rates compared to TAH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study, the mean operative (64.7 min) time was shorter then reported in standard TLH (99.3 [15] and 126 min [16]). This is also less than reports by Kavallaris et al (80-90 min) and Mebes et al (90-111 min) [5,7].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In the present study the mean operative (64.7 minutes) time was shorter then reported in standard TLH ( 99.3 [13] and 126 minutes [14]). The shorter operative time can be explained by the elimination of the time needed to apply uterine or vaginal manipulation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%