Total knee arthroplasty three-dimensional kinematic estimation prevision. From a two-dimensional fluoroscopy acquired dynamic model

Lebel, B.; Pineau, V.; Gouzy, S.; Geais, Laurent; Parienti, Jean‐Jacques; Dutheil, Jean-Jacques; Vielpeau, C.

doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2011.01.003

Cited by 10 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the contrary, Zeighami et al quantified the accuracy with simulated images from 3D models of femur and tibia virtually positioned in different configuration of flexion. We also Table 4 Accuracy of each angular and linear parameters in the current study, compared to results of 2D fluoroscopy studies [4,12,13]. reported the value of accuracy for each flexion pose.…”

Section: In Vitro Accuracymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Finally, it can be noticed that the semi-automatic process remained time consuming with a 90 min process for 5 poses against 20 min for 4 poses with our manual method. In the literature, several studies investigated the accuracy of the in vitro estimation of tibia and femur poses from 2D fluoroscopy associated with the 3D model against optoelectronic devices [4,12,13] (Table 4). However, the comparison to previous results must be made with care as several conditions differed.…”

Section: In Vitro Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only Acker et al proposed to evaluate the method on 6 static poses. Finally, the reported pose could be the one of the femur [4], of the tibia (present study) or of the knee joint [12,13]. The average difference between each position parameter and the cluster-based gold standard is summarized in Table 4.…”

Section: In Vitro Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in vivo extensive evaluations remain difficult due either to the radiant or invasive nature of direct bone localization techniques [3][4][5][6][7][8] or to inaccuracies associated to external measurement procedures like optical motion capture [9][10][11]. Thus, the registration on 2D fluoroscopic images of a 3D model obtained from CT-scan is so far considered as the gold standard for the capture of skeletal motion and the accuracy of the method has been evaluated through in vitro studies [4,12,13]. Considering that this technique exposes the subject to a high level of radiation, an alternative has been proposed taking advantage of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize bones during sequential knee joint motion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

3D Sequential Kinematics of the Femoro-Tibial Joint of Normal Knee from Multiple Bi-planar X-rays: Accuracy and Repeatability

Langlois

Pillet

Lavaste

et al. 2018

IRBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlights• The EOS system allows the sequential kinematic analysis of the femoro-tibial joint. • The reliability of the registration of 3D model on 2D views has been quantified. • The accuracy of the registration is inferior to 1.6 mm and 0.4 • . • The repeatability of the registration is 0.3 • , 2.1 • and 1.6 • , for the rotations. • The repeatability of the registration is inferior to 1.8 mm for the translations. Graphical abstract AbstractBackground: Several methods can be used to assess joint kinematics going from optoelectronic motion analysis to biplanar fluoroscopy. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the reliability of the use of biplane radiography to quantify the sequential 3D kinematics of the femoro-tibial joint.Methods: Bi-planar X-rays (EOS imaging) of 12 lower limbs (6 specimens in vitro and 6 subjects in vivo) were taken for various knee flexion angles. 3D personalized models of the femur and the tibia were registered on each pair of views. To quantify the bias, the kinematic parameters calculated from the registered models were compared to those obtained from the tripods embedded in the specimens. Intra and inter-operator repeatability of each parameter were assessed from the registrations made by 3 operators in vivo.Results: In vitro, the bias of the tibia pose estimation obtained from the registration method was inferior to 1.6 mm and 0.4 • . In vivo, the repeatability of the sequential kinematic parameters was inferior to 0.3 • , 2.1 • and 1.8 • , for respectively flexion, varus-valgus and medial-lateral rotation and inferior to 1.8 mm for translations.Conclusion: Compared to simple fluoroscopy, the accuracy of our method based on sequential images was of the same order of magnitude, with better results for the translation in the frontal plane. The low dose of radiation of the EOS system offers promising prospects for a clinical use of this method to assess the femoro-tibial sequential kinematics.

show abstract

Section: In Vitro Accuracymentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: In Vitro Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: In Vitro Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

3D Sequential Kinematics of the Femoro-Tibial Joint of Normal Knee from Multiple Bi-planar X-rays: Accuracy and Repeatability

Langlois

Pillet

Lavaste

et al. 2018

IRBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prior studies aimed to assess the accuracy of this shape-matching technique have reported absolute accuracies on the order of a millimeter and sub-degrees (Banks and Hodge 1996; Mahfouz et al 2003; Yamazaki et al 2004). Relative joint kinematics has reported errors of less than 2.1 degrees and 1.9 mm using a single plane fluoroscopy system (Acker et al 2011; Lebel et al 2011). It is important to note that many of these studies determine accuracy based on a foam model of the bones without soft tissue – an idealistic case without added noise from surrounding musculature and skin.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterizing fluoroscopy based kinematic accuracy as a function of pulse width and velocity

Ellingson

Mozingo²,

Magnuson

et al. 2016

Journal of Biomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fluoroscopic imaging has become increasingly popular to investigate total knee arthroplasty kinematics non-invasively - 3D implant models are aligned with 2D image projections, and optimized via an edge-contour alignment technique. Previous studies have quantified the accuracy of this approach, however they do not adequately address the impact of image collection parameters. A particularly sensitive parameter is the pulse width, or exposure time per frame At longer pulse widths, a more motion is captured in a single frame; this can lead to image blur and subsequent degradation to image edge quality. Therefore, the comparative accuracy of relative joint kinematics as a function of pulse width and joint velocity needs to be defined. A limits of agreement approach was taken to define the mean differences between optoelectric kinematic measures (gold standard) and fluoroscopic methods at various pulse widths (1, 8, 16ms) and knee velocities (50, 100, 225°/s). The mean absolute differences between the optoelectric and fluoroscopic methods for 1ms pulse width was less than 1.5° and 0.9mm. Comparable rotational differences (1.3°) were observed for the 8ms pulse width but had larger translational differences (1.4mm). The 16ms pulse width yielded the greatest mean differences (2.0° and 1.6mm), which increased with knee flexion velocity. The importance of pulse width and velocity should not be overlooked for future studies - this parameter has proven to be a sensitive metric in the quantification of joint motion via fluoroscopy and must be identified and reported in future studies.

show abstract

Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model

Petersen

Vind

Jürgens-Lahnstein

et al. 2022

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiostereometic analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for rigid body pose (position and orientation) in three-dimensional space. Traditionally, RSA is based on insertion of periprosthetic tantalum markers and manual implant contour selection which limit clinically application. We propose an automated image registration technique utilizing digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) of computed tomography (CT) volumetric bone models (autorsa-bone) as a substitute for tantalum markers.Furthermore, an automated synthetic volumetric representation of total knee arthroplasty implant models (autorsa-volume) to improve previous silhouetteprojection methods (autorsa-surface). As reference, we investigated the accuracy of implanted tantalum markers (marker) or a conventional manually contour-based method (mbrsa) for the femur and tibia. The data are presented as mean (standard deviation). The autorsa-bone method displayed similar accuracy of −0.013 (0.075) mm compared to the gold standard method (marker) of −0.013 (0.085). The autorsavolume with 0.034 (0.106) mm did not markedly improve the autorsa-surface with 0.002 (0.129) mm, and none of these reached the mbrsa method of −0.009 (0.094) mm. In conclusion, marker-free RSA is feasible with similar accuracy as gold standard utilizing DRR and CT obtained volumetric bone models. Furthermore, utilizing synthetic generated volumetric implant models could not improve the silhouettebased method. However, with a slight loss of accuracy the autorsa methods provide a feasible automated alternative to the semi-automated method.

show abstract

Total knee arthroplasty three-dimensional kinematic estimation prevision. From a two-dimensional fluoroscopy acquired dynamic model

Cited by 10 publications

References 24 publications

3D Sequential Kinematics of the Femoro-Tibial Joint of Normal Knee from Multiple Bi-planar X-rays: Accuracy and Repeatability

3D Sequential Kinematics of the Femoro-Tibial Joint of Normal Knee from Multiple Bi-planar X-rays: Accuracy and Repeatability

Characterizing fluoroscopy based kinematic accuracy as a function of pulse width and velocity

Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About