2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Younger Patients Evaluated by Alternative Outcome Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a longer LOS is associated with an increased use of hospital resources [33]. Second, fast-track protocols could result in better cost-effectiveness because patients that have better function when discharged from hospital would require less pain medication, a lower number of physiotherapy treatments and a lower number of days spent in rehabilitation centres, and they would be able to return to work sooner [34, 35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a longer LOS is associated with an increased use of hospital resources [33]. Second, fast-track protocols could result in better cost-effectiveness because patients that have better function when discharged from hospital would require less pain medication, a lower number of physiotherapy treatments and a lower number of days spent in rehabilitation centres, and they would be able to return to work sooner [34, 35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while only 7% (7/95) expected TKA to negatively impact their sexual activity, 32% (20/62) experienced a negative change at 12 months. This difference between preoperative expectations and postoperative reality was statistically significant (p<0.0001) 17. No differences were found between males and females.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Thirty-nine articles were identified as potentially containing data describing postoperative sexual function after TKA, and these texts were reviewed in full for eligibility. Ten of these studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, one of which was eliminated because it did not discuss subject matter relevant to this systematic review,13 and another because it presented the exact same patient data in a PhD thesis16 as a subsequent publication by the same author in a peer-reviewed journal 17. As a result, a total of eight papers were included for analysis, which are summarised in table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the influence of nonparticipants could not be controlled and the net rate of return was 12.1% and 12.2%, respectively, potential response bias and its resulting limitations to the study results cannot be excluded [27]. Second, while the sample of patients from 43 hospitals does approximate the hospital structure of a region of Germany, the ability to generalize the results to other regions and countries still needs to be clarified [28]. Third, the present study cannot claim to be exhaustive, due to a number of intangible factors that can influence the choice of a hospital [29].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%