“…However, in practice, inverse Laplace transforms can yield results that are artifactual. Consequently, this method requires careful attention to a number of factors including the degree to which the accuracy of the data influences the accuracy of the inverse transform, the use when possible of reference samples, the possibility that the fluorophores or the medium in which they are embedded alter the local refractive index, the special emission properties of fluorophores next to interfaces (see below), possible deleterious effects arising from scattered evanescent illumination, and instrumental factors such as optical convolution in the x-y plane and image acquisition time [8,[85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93].Alternative approaches to inverse Laplace transforming are to specify an approximate model for the theoretical form of C(z) [85] or to examine the ratio of fluorescence intensities measured at two different incidence angles [94,95], although these approaches do not necessarily circumvent all of the potential complicating factors listed above. Higher refractive index substrates are useful in VA-TIRF because they have a lower critical angle for internal reflection, and therefore enable a wider range of incidence angles and evanescent wave depths [89,90].…”