2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Outpatient Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Age and body mass index were not exclusion criteria: planned surgical procedures did not require general anesthesia, thus eliminating concerns of postoperative hypoxia due to apnea or airway difficulty due to paralysis of the respiratory tract. 13,14 Substantial cost reduction in the high-efficiency OR was achieved by (a) using patient selection criteria recommended for ambulatory surgery (i.e., American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score ≤ 3), 13,[15][16][17][18] permitting the use of local anesthesia and nerve blocks (proven to provide better pain control 19 ), eliminating the need for PACU; (b) eliminating the scrub nurse, as well as designating roles to the circulating nurse or OR aide, thus saving 1 full-time salaried position; [20][21][22] (c) minimizing the number of instruments and amount of equipment required to perform surgeries (the highefficiency OR carried out less complex cases and thus required fewer tools); and (d) grouping similar cases together, allowing for better operative efficiency. 23 A minimal, negligible increase in physiotherapy cost was offset by improved outcomes for the patients and led to a relative decrease in the surgeon workload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age and body mass index were not exclusion criteria: planned surgical procedures did not require general anesthesia, thus eliminating concerns of postoperative hypoxia due to apnea or airway difficulty due to paralysis of the respiratory tract. 13,14 Substantial cost reduction in the high-efficiency OR was achieved by (a) using patient selection criteria recommended for ambulatory surgery (i.e., American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score ≤ 3), 13,[15][16][17][18] permitting the use of local anesthesia and nerve blocks (proven to provide better pain control 19 ), eliminating the need for PACU; (b) eliminating the scrub nurse, as well as designating roles to the circulating nurse or OR aide, thus saving 1 full-time salaried position; [20][21][22] (c) minimizing the number of instruments and amount of equipment required to perform surgeries (the highefficiency OR carried out less complex cases and thus required fewer tools); and (d) grouping similar cases together, allowing for better operative efficiency. 23 A minimal, negligible increase in physiotherapy cost was offset by improved outcomes for the patients and led to a relative decrease in the surgeon workload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASA score is accepted in the medical community as an index of the risk associated with surgery. However, Sayeed et al 42 suggested that because the original purpose of the ASA score was not to safely select outpatient THA candidates, and because it has not been validated for use in rapid recovery THA programs, it should not be considered as a predictive factor for early discharge. This further underlines the need for studies focusing on patient profiling to select the most suitable candidates for a safe and successful outpatient THA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 En Estados Unidos, se proyecta que en 2030 la frecuencia de realización de artroplastia de cadera será de 1 385 649. 3,4 Además, Register et al 5 reportaron que en 2014 se realizaron más de 1 millón de artroplastias electivas de extremidades inferiores en dicho país, con reembolsos por procedimiento entre USD 16 500 y USD 75 000. 5 En este sentido, se evidencia la importancia de trabajar en la realización de protocolos y estrategias para disminuir el impacto económico de este tipo de procedimientos, incluyendo aquellos con un manejo ambulatorio del paciente.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…El desarrollo de procedimientos quirúrgicos menos invasivos y de estrategias para prevenir la pérdida de sangre, así como un mejor control del dolor perioperatorio en pacientes ambulatorios en comparación con aquellos que reciben manejo intrahospitalario [6][7][8] han permitido mejorar los protocolos de rehabilitación, disminuyendo la frecuencia de posibles complicaciones inherentes a la hospitalización [9][10][11][12][13] y los costos para los sistemas de salud. 4,14 En este contexto, surge la necesidad de estudiar la satisfacción y el control del dolor en pacientes sometidos a RTC con manejo ambulatorio.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified