2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2219-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total hip arthroplasty following failure of tantalum rod implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with 5- to 10-year follow-up

Abstract: BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) with failure of tantalum rod implant for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) will be the only choice for patients. However,it remains unknown whether tantalum rod implantation has an adverse effect on the survival time of implants following conversion to THA. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of conversion to THA in patients who were previously treated with implantation of a tantalum rod.MethodsThis study inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extracting a rod is technically demanding due to strong osseointegration of the porous tantalum rod (10). Challenges inclu0de increased blood loss, longer operative time, bone loss along the trajectory of the rod and the subsequent potential increased risk of femoral fracture (44,45). For this reason, additional data and further prospective studies are required to support the conclusion that tantalum rod implantation is more effective than bone transplant or core decompression and to assess the risks, benefits and financial issues for patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting a rod is technically demanding due to strong osseointegration of the porous tantalum rod (10). Challenges inclu0de increased blood loss, longer operative time, bone loss along the trajectory of the rod and the subsequent potential increased risk of femoral fracture (44,45). For this reason, additional data and further prospective studies are required to support the conclusion that tantalum rod implantation is more effective than bone transplant or core decompression and to assess the risks, benefits and financial issues for patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is difficult to completely remove necrotic bone. Actually the necrotic subchondral bone is hard to heal with bone graft, marked collapsed is still observed during conversion to THA [18,[27][28][29][30][31] . Second, we could not perform perfect bone grafting to fill the canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these treatment modalities have been found to be universally successful. The reasons for the failure of these treatments are that dead bone cannot be replaced by viable bone, subchondral bone does not have sufficient mechanical support, and subsequent progression of osteoarthritis [27][28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is difficult to completely remove necrotic bone. Actually the necrotic subchondral bone is hard to heal with bone graft, marked collapsed is still observed during conversion to THA [18,[27][28][29][30][31] . Second, we could not perform perfect bone grafting to fill the canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these treatment modalities have been found to be universally successful. The reasons for the failure of these treatments are that dead bone cannot be replaced by viable bone, subchondral bone does not have sufficient mechanical support, and subsequent progression of osteoarthritis [27][28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%