Abstract:Introduction To report total endovascular treatment for a rare case of Crawford extent IV thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) using custom-designed branched device in a patient with Behçet’s disease. Methods A 50 years’ old man with history of BD was accidentally diagnosed Crawford extent IV TAAA during computed tomography follow-up after left nephrectomy of renal carcinoma. The aneurysm extended from descending aorta to right common iliac artery with a maximum diameter of 6.2 cm. Results The endovascular… Show more
“…20 However, open surgery for inflammatory TAAA remains difficult, because of the perianeurysmal adhesions of the adjacent tissues, an up to 30% to 50% risk of recurrent pseudoaneurysm at the anastomosis site, and even a potential to exacerbate the process of inflammation. [21][22][23] Endovascular repair with adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids for inflammatory aneurysm has been documented carrying less procedural trauma and higher survival rate than open repair, and a shift from open repair to endovascular repair has been recommended by some studies. [22][23][24] In the current study, 4 of the 10 cases were diagnosed inflammatory aneurysms, and 3 of them (except case 3, abdominal radiotherapy induced inflammatory aneurysm) accepted adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Endovascular repair with adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids for inflammatory aneurysm has been documented carrying less procedural trauma and higher survival rate than open repair, and a shift from open repair to endovascular repair has been recommended by some studies. [22][23][24] In the current study, 4 of the 10 cases were diagnosed inflammatory aneurysms, and 3 of them (except case 3, abdominal radiotherapy induced inflammatory aneurysm) accepted adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids. Indeed, the mid-term clinical outcome is encouraging.…”
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using off-the-shelf “Octopus” technique to treat ruptured or symptomatic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAAA). Methods and Results: All cases who underwent “Octopus” technique from May 2016 to May 2019 at our center were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 10 cases (8 males) were included. The mean age was 54.5±14.2 years (range: 31–80 years). Eight cases presented as aneurysm rupture or impending rupture accepted emergency repair. Technical success, defined by placement of all endografts as planned, was achieved in all cases. A total of 30 target visceral branches were successfully cannulated, 9 celiac arteries were covered intentionally. Intraoperative endoleak was observed in 6 patients, all of them were gutter leak. During hospital stay, there was no death, no side branch occlusion or spinal cord ischemia. Median follow-up was 30 months (range: 12–50 months). One patient died of lung cancer at 14-month follow-up. There was no secondary endoleak. The primary endoleak were found spontaneously resolved in 3 cases at 7 days, 3-month, and 1-year imaging. One persistent endoleak totally resolved after sealing of gutter spaces at 4-month follow-up. The other 2 persistent endoleak decreased during follow-up, which are still under observation. The branch patency rate was 90.3% (28/31). All the 3 occluded branches were renal arteries. Branch occlusion occurred in 2 cases at 1-month follow-up and 1 case at 2-year follow-up, but renal insufficiency was not observed in these cases. Obvious aneurysm sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) was observed in all cases. The aneurysm size shrunk from 7.6±1.9 to 5.5±1.4 cm. No spinal cord ischemia occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: Treatment of ruptured TAAA and PRAAA with “Octopus” technique is feasible and safe for high surgical risk patients in the absence of fenestrated and branched devices. The long-term clinical outcomes needed to be investigated.
“…20 However, open surgery for inflammatory TAAA remains difficult, because of the perianeurysmal adhesions of the adjacent tissues, an up to 30% to 50% risk of recurrent pseudoaneurysm at the anastomosis site, and even a potential to exacerbate the process of inflammation. [21][22][23] Endovascular repair with adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids for inflammatory aneurysm has been documented carrying less procedural trauma and higher survival rate than open repair, and a shift from open repair to endovascular repair has been recommended by some studies. [22][23][24] In the current study, 4 of the 10 cases were diagnosed inflammatory aneurysms, and 3 of them (except case 3, abdominal radiotherapy induced inflammatory aneurysm) accepted adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Endovascular repair with adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids for inflammatory aneurysm has been documented carrying less procedural trauma and higher survival rate than open repair, and a shift from open repair to endovascular repair has been recommended by some studies. [22][23][24] In the current study, 4 of the 10 cases were diagnosed inflammatory aneurysms, and 3 of them (except case 3, abdominal radiotherapy induced inflammatory aneurysm) accepted adjunctive immunosuppresive therapy and corticosteroids. Indeed, the mid-term clinical outcome is encouraging.…”
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using off-the-shelf “Octopus” technique to treat ruptured or symptomatic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAAA). Methods and Results: All cases who underwent “Octopus” technique from May 2016 to May 2019 at our center were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 10 cases (8 males) were included. The mean age was 54.5±14.2 years (range: 31–80 years). Eight cases presented as aneurysm rupture or impending rupture accepted emergency repair. Technical success, defined by placement of all endografts as planned, was achieved in all cases. A total of 30 target visceral branches were successfully cannulated, 9 celiac arteries were covered intentionally. Intraoperative endoleak was observed in 6 patients, all of them were gutter leak. During hospital stay, there was no death, no side branch occlusion or spinal cord ischemia. Median follow-up was 30 months (range: 12–50 months). One patient died of lung cancer at 14-month follow-up. There was no secondary endoleak. The primary endoleak were found spontaneously resolved in 3 cases at 7 days, 3-month, and 1-year imaging. One persistent endoleak totally resolved after sealing of gutter spaces at 4-month follow-up. The other 2 persistent endoleak decreased during follow-up, which are still under observation. The branch patency rate was 90.3% (28/31). All the 3 occluded branches were renal arteries. Branch occlusion occurred in 2 cases at 1-month follow-up and 1 case at 2-year follow-up, but renal insufficiency was not observed in these cases. Obvious aneurysm sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) was observed in all cases. The aneurysm size shrunk from 7.6±1.9 to 5.5±1.4 cm. No spinal cord ischemia occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: Treatment of ruptured TAAA and PRAAA with “Octopus” technique is feasible and safe for high surgical risk patients in the absence of fenestrated and branched devices. The long-term clinical outcomes needed to be investigated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.