2018
DOI: 10.1080/01902148.2018.1489015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total emitted dose of salbutamol sulphate at different inhalation flows and inhalation volumes through different types of dry powder inhalers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The codes for the in vitro model included; X1: Dry powder inhaler type [0.1 for Turbohaler (Terbutaline); 0.2 for Diskus (Salbutamol) and 0.3 for the Aerolizer (formoterol fumarate)] as shown in Table 1, X2: Inhalation flow (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 L/min), X3: Inhalation volume (2 and 4 L) and X4: Number of inhalations (1 or 2). The output property Y1 is the percentage of the emitted dose, respectively 6,18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The codes for the in vitro model included; X1: Dry powder inhaler type [0.1 for Turbohaler (Terbutaline); 0.2 for Diskus (Salbutamol) and 0.3 for the Aerolizer (formoterol fumarate)] as shown in Table 1, X2: Inhalation flow (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 L/min), X3: Inhalation volume (2 and 4 L) and X4: Number of inhalations (1 or 2). The output property Y1 is the percentage of the emitted dose, respectively 6,18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum inhalation volume for the best aerosol delivery should be determined for each DPI. Guidelines for using different DPIs are available for optimising the emitted potion of aerosol 17,18 . Hence, DPI efficiency is highly dependent on the patient's inspiratory effort, formulation characteristics and inhalation technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning RIF determination, data generating from each animal in terms of drug concentration were related to the drug loading corresponding to each administered sample. Moreover, since relationships between dosage emission and device flow-rate are well known [33][34][35], the actual inhaled dose per mouse was calculated by considering RIF amount not emitted by the device. The actual emission doses were ≥70% of those loaded inside the device (78.6 ± 3.3%, 69.3 ± 9.2%, 85.6 ± 5.4%, for SLNas/MS, SLNas/MS-ST, SLNas/ST, respectively) apart from SLNas/F127 with an emission dose of 53.4 ± 10.7% owing to its very poor flowability and high cohesiveness already highlighted in our previous work [17].…”
Section: In Vivo Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data showed that after two inhalations, the theophylline dose emitted was 90% and 91% from Breezhaler® and Handihaler® respectively, this suggests that our data was in line with the optimised models described by Ali and Abdelrahim. Boshra et al, (2018) compared the performance of two inhaler devices namely Diskus® and Aeroliser® using two separate inhalations. Their results showed that at an inhalation flow ≤30 L min −1 two inhalations resulted in higher TED than one inhalation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%