2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total dust deposition flux during precipitation in Toyama, Japan, in the spring of 2009: A sensitivity analysis with the NASA GEOS-5 Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this visibility method has not always been entirely accurate to judge Kosa days. For example, several studies reported their own "judged" Kosa days based on the methods different from that used by JMA (Matoba et al 2005;Mizoguchi et al 2009;Yasunari et al 2016). These previous studies could imply that the number of Kosa days reported by JMA might be smaller than the actual number of Kosa days, that should have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this visibility method has not always been entirely accurate to judge Kosa days. For example, several studies reported their own "judged" Kosa days based on the methods different from that used by JMA (Matoba et al 2005;Mizoguchi et al 2009;Yasunari et al 2016). These previous studies could imply that the number of Kosa days reported by JMA might be smaller than the actual number of Kosa days, that should have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…go.jp/Takikawa/). Because the depolarization ratio is available, the lidar data can provide us the information on non-spherical particles such as dust particles (e.g., Shimizu et al 2004;Osada et al 2011;Yasunari et al 2016). We use the calculated dust and spherical extinction coefficients of the lidar data (Sugimoto et al 2003;Shimizu et al 2004) at Takikawa to confirm Kosa (dust) transports there (also see SI Text).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regional scale quantification considers the cumulative frequency and spatial extent of longrange transported events, particularly where this impacts populated urban areas (Lin et al, 2015), and global scale quantification determines the impact an event has on background concentration levels. Where monitors are not available, mathematical tools such as dispersion modelling (Li et al, 2016b;Lin and Li, 2016;Philip et al, 2016;Yasunari et al, 2016), neural networks (Taylor et al, 2016;Wong et al, 2015;Xiao et al, 2015) and statistical procedures such as source apportionment (Belis et al, 2013) methods can model impacts. However, these calculation methods have higher uncertainties than direct monitoring due to approximations and input assumptions inherent to the chosen model (Solomos et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%