Volume 5: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Ceramics; Structures and Dynamics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; 1998
DOI: 10.1115/98-gt-533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total and Static Quantity Measurements in Unsteady Flow — Effect of Unsteadiness

Abstract: The effects of unsteadiness both on high-response dynamic measurements and on time-averaged measurements with slow-response probes are analytically investigated separately from the response characteristics of the measuring system. The approach is based on physical similarity and dimensional analysis. The potential errors from flow unsteadiness and the major parameters which influence the measurement results are discussed. In the case of five sensor spherical probes a quantitative investigation for inviscid, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is usually mitigated by placing the lateral holes downstream of the recirculation bubble. An extensive investigation of the respective effects of sensor location and wedge apex angle was conducted by Humm et al, 1994, andAinsworth, 1995. The frequency range of the probe is limited by the characteristic size of the probe (Lou et al, 1998), as well as the geometry and sensor implementation due to cavity resonances and sensor cut-off frequencies. Obtaining a high angular resolution typically requires to minimize the probe size; this can mean having holes in separated regions, which is detrimental on the probe frequency response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is usually mitigated by placing the lateral holes downstream of the recirculation bubble. An extensive investigation of the respective effects of sensor location and wedge apex angle was conducted by Humm et al, 1994, andAinsworth, 1995. The frequency range of the probe is limited by the characteristic size of the probe (Lou et al, 1998), as well as the geometry and sensor implementation due to cavity resonances and sensor cut-off frequencies. Obtaining a high angular resolution typically requires to minimize the probe size; this can mean having holes in separated regions, which is detrimental on the probe frequency response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%