2003
DOI: 10.1177/1037969x0302800501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tort Deform or Tort Reform?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this author's unfavourable evaluation of the reform as a whole, it follows that a similar view would be reached with the changes concerning general damages. With the three aims of 'legislative "reform" of the common law tort of negligence…[being] to reduce the cost of legal proceedings; reduce the number of frivolous claims for minor injuries; and to cap the size of large claims', 107 In essence his argument is based on American pragmatism with the idea that the means are justifiable by the end. It is lamentable that the Australian legal system has imported such values from the United States of America rather than commendable features of her legal system.…”
Section: Overview Of the Case Against The Existing Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this author's unfavourable evaluation of the reform as a whole, it follows that a similar view would be reached with the changes concerning general damages. With the three aims of 'legislative "reform" of the common law tort of negligence…[being] to reduce the cost of legal proceedings; reduce the number of frivolous claims for minor injuries; and to cap the size of large claims', 107 In essence his argument is based on American pragmatism with the idea that the means are justifiable by the end. It is lamentable that the Australian legal system has imported such values from the United States of America rather than commendable features of her legal system.…”
Section: Overview Of the Case Against The Existing Regimementioning
confidence: 99%