migrating caval devices. 1 While ingestion of foreign bodies is common, the incidence of them requiring operative intervention is rare with figures between 1 and 14% quoted in the literature. 2,3 Most foreign bodies therefore pass freely through the gastrointestinal tract. If trapped and subsequent perforation occurs, it tends to be at areas with great angulation such as the ileocaecal valve, junctions along the duodenum, the appendix and the haustra of the large intestine. 1-3 Perforation of the duodenum remains exceedingly rare and even more so if involving nearby vascular structures. 4 Depending on the calibre of the DCF and the size, location and relative ease of removing the trapped foreign body, significant morbidity and mortality have been reported. This is secondary to overwhelming haemorrhage, sepsis and iatrogenic complications. 5 Endoscopic retrieval is one acceptable approach in the stable patient with localized perforation. 2 Due to the rarity of this presentation, there is not any evidence to compare whether open or endoscopic approach has the best outcome. This is because open management is usually associated with significant patient morbidity because of the need to mobilize and open retroperitoneal structures with consequent risk of duodenal fistulas and bleeding. Also open operation is the most common approach in the unstable patient and given the nature of this condition, it is more common that a patient would present in an unstable state and therefore undergo an open approach. Our case is one example of where endoscopic retrieval has been successful.Pulmonary embolization as a consequence of DCF has been reported even less frequently. 5 The clot lodged in the filter at time of retrieval leads us to believe that its placement in this case helped prevent and/or minimized pulmonary seeding and septic emboli.In summary, the key points of this case are that CT imaging is the diagnostic imaging of choice for foreign body perforation of the duodenum. Endoscopic retrieval can be considered in selected patients and was shown to be successful in our case. Recognizing IVC involvement and treatment with intravenous filter may minimize septic thromboembolic complications. References 1. Allen B, Krupski WC, Wylie EJ. Toothpick perforation of the inferior vena cava. West. J. Med. 1983; 138: 727-30. 2. Symeonidis D, Koukoulis G, Baloyiannis I, Rizos A, Mamaloudis I, Tepetes K. Ingested fish bone: an unusual mechanism of duodenal perforation and pancreatic trauma. A 19-year-old woman, with no significant past medical history, was admitted to the emergency ward for a 24 h non-radiated insidious abdominal pain localized in the left flank, accompanied by nausea, vomiting and low-grade fever. Physical examination revealed mild abdominal pain and tenderness in the left flank. Blood analysis showed a mild leucocytosis (14 300/mmc) and a C-reactive protein of 6.1 mg/dL; urinalysis was normal. An abdominal ultrasonography was performed, showing a mobile intraperitoneal mass, of 66 × 50 mm, adjacent to the upper pol...