1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00533985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torsion in K2 of fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…7.3] and to Suslin in general [35,Cor. 5.7]) is more complicated; however, we do have the following result.…”
Section: Proof Of Claim Takementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.3] and to Suslin in general [35,Cor. 5.7]) is more complicated; however, we do have the following result.…”
Section: Proof Of Claim Takementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every element k ∈ H 0 (X, K 2,X ) of the kernel of dlog 2 lies in M (F(X)) = n∈N p n K 2 (F(X)) by the Bloch-Gabber-Kato theorem. Since K 2 (F(X)) has no p-torsion by Theorem 1.10 of [23] on page 10, the group…”
Section: Hence (I) and (Ii) Of Proposition 44 Hold For D By Propositmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tate [8] proved that if F is a global field containing ζ n , a primitive nth root of unity, then every element of order n in K 2 (F ) can be written in the form of {ζ n , a}, a ∈ F * . Suslin [7] generalized Tate's result to any field containing ζ n . It is natural to generalize this result further to a field possibly not containing ζ n .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%